This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(cancelled because of no recognizable connection with the topic)
I tooko this out:
The quoted ref [1] says 4000 BP, which doesn't fit in with the claimed PO timing, and certainly can't be *caused* by the PO William M. Connolley ( talk) 12:00, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
References
{{
cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |month=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Piora Oscillation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Note that the 5300 cal. BP, given in Magny/Haas, correspond to 3350 cal. BC, and thus contradict the former here given time span. I corrected it to more up-to-date views. 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:5019:39F1:6412:EAD0 ( talk) 06:14, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
I removed the graph because it is by far to rough as being of service to detect a relation to the alleged Piora oscillation. 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:7127:2BCA:7529:7DB7 ( talk) 10:06, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
I deleted the phantasy sentence "Other authorities associate the Piora Oscillation with other comparable events, like the 8.2 kiloyear event, that recur in climate history, as part of a larger 1500-year climate cycle." with no "other authorities" named. 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:7127:2BCA:7529:7DB7 ( talk) 10:10, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
The whole article is pure self-contradicting nonsense, given the self-contradicting sources. I know all literature from alpine researchers and not two of them agree unless copied from each other. Most trustworthy is Maligny, because around -3'350 and ONLY there, a sharp decline in temperatures appears in many climatic proxies, as e.g., Greenland icecores, Alpine treelines, or tree-Ring studies. See my graph at Holocen climate. HJJHolm ( talk) 15:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(cancelled because of no recognizable connection with the topic)
I tooko this out:
The quoted ref [1] says 4000 BP, which doesn't fit in with the claimed PO timing, and certainly can't be *caused* by the PO William M. Connolley ( talk) 12:00, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
References
{{
cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |month=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Piora Oscillation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Note that the 5300 cal. BP, given in Magny/Haas, correspond to 3350 cal. BC, and thus contradict the former here given time span. I corrected it to more up-to-date views. 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:5019:39F1:6412:EAD0 ( talk) 06:14, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
I removed the graph because it is by far to rough as being of service to detect a relation to the alleged Piora oscillation. 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:7127:2BCA:7529:7DB7 ( talk) 10:06, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
I deleted the phantasy sentence "Other authorities associate the Piora Oscillation with other comparable events, like the 8.2 kiloyear event, that recur in climate history, as part of a larger 1500-year climate cycle." with no "other authorities" named. 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:7127:2BCA:7529:7DB7 ( talk) 10:10, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
The whole article is pure self-contradicting nonsense, given the self-contradicting sources. I know all literature from alpine researchers and not two of them agree unless copied from each other. Most trustworthy is Maligny, because around -3'350 and ONLY there, a sharp decline in temperatures appears in many climatic proxies, as e.g., Greenland icecores, Alpine treelines, or tree-Ring studies. See my graph at Holocen climate. HJJHolm ( talk) 15:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)