![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I rember someone telling me that you can fly with an instructor and log hours before turning 16, some recomend starting at 14 or 14 and a half. Is there a minimum age to log hours? -- Rcopley ( talk) 11:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Can anyone identify the source where for the information that spells out each category/class recognized by the FAA? I'm working on a project where I need to know each category/class combo that exists, and I can't find any info anywhere in FAA publications. 72.191.163.46 ( talk) 20:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Funny you should ask, I've been looking for that very thing for quite some time now, and I just recently found it. 61.5 in the FARs "certificates issued under this part". Can be found at: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=fe883b51b410ca933863b67eb94fd3d7&rgn=div8&view=text&node=14:2.0.1.1.2.1.1.4&idno=14
24.22.24.208 ( talk) 21:50, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Could we clarify the reference to judicial action being required to revoke a 'license' ? Nowhere in 14 CFR is reference made to the term 'license' except in connection with a US driver's license, and a 'foreign pilot license' (presumably because of terminology used in ICAO Annex 1). The FAA has no basis for talking about any other sort of license. ( weirpwoer ( talk) 10:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)).
This section doesn't make sense. Certificates don't have categories, ratings do. My certificate isn't in the airplane category, I have a certificate with a rating for airplanes. Not quite sure how to fix this so I'm just complaining. :-) -- Captaindan 18:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
It has been suggested that Flight instruction (US) be merged into this article or section.
Agree - that article is ugly and this article has all the same information.
Joblio
19:59, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Agree - I will work on this as time allows
ChadScott
05:04, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Completed!
ChadScott
04:27, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
The statement, "To obtain a certificate or add a rating, a pilot usually has to undergo..." confuses me. Under what situations would a pilot NOT have to undergo training with an instructor and log the relevant aeronautical experience to obtain an additional certificate or rating? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ChadScott ( talk • contribs) 19:28, 4 February 2006 (UTC).
The article is US specific, and all of the rest of the certificates ( Private Pilot Licence, Commercial Pilot Licence, etc.) are basically disambiguation pages that point to how pilots are licenced by country. McNeight 23:43, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
It appears that a bit of Recreational Pilot rules slipped in here by mistake. As of July 10, 2009, Sport Pilots are still limited to 10,000 feet MSL, with no 2000 feet AGL exception. See 61.315(c)(11) for details. This was an error in an edit of December 13, 2008 that said that the limit was the max of the two altitudes. Unless someone can quote an exception to the rules that has been published by the FAA, it would seem best to revert that change back to simply 10,000 feet MSL. Alan Larson ( talk) 22:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
By Chris Chlumsky on 12/18/09:
I contacted the legal department at AOPA to determine the validity of the 2,000 AGL portion, and am told by that authority that this is in error. The limit of 10,000 MSL is absolute. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.137.10.187 ( talk) 06:23, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
By James M (bystander, potential pilot): The 2000AGL reference still seems to be there. Living near the Sierras, this is an interesting/useful item. Appreciate the work everyone, this has been helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.234.23 ( talk) 23:49, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Will the anon who keeps adding completely ridiculous B.S. like "must pass high school with physics and mathematics" and "Class I medical by approved doctor" to the Commercial section please explain him- or herself? There is absolutely NOTHING anywhere in Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 61, that addresses such specific education requirements, and commercial pilots are *explicitly* required to hold only a second-class medical.-- chris. lawson 02:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
You are only required to hold a 3rd class medical for any checkride, and no medical at all if the checkride is accomplished in an "approved flight training device". See preamble to COM and ATP/TR PTS 66.60.188.7 ( talk) 16:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Christopher
I think Pilot Journey (www.pilotjourney.com) really should be added to external links. The site has the largest, most up to date list of flight schools AND Pilot Journey's Discovery Flight program is now larger than Be a Pilots with over 1000 coupons issued each month. -Gary
PilotOutlook.com has detailed information on these licenses. If you wish, you can add a link for it here - Rajat
I see a lot of edits where people are adding the qualifier, "...in the United States..." This article *is* about how the certification structure, process, and qualifications are in the United States, so it's a redundant qualifier. So, stop doing that. :) ChadScott 18:11, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Is there any possibility to aquire this rating fully or in parts with a Aircam plane [1] ?
Just found an article about the history of this plane: Leza-Lockwood Company 84.173.213.112 12:49, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi... I am 16 years old and i wish to know if i am able to be a pilot. I wear glases... My dioptry is: -0.5 on both eyes
correctable to 20/20 must be 17 years of age to be a private pilot. Then go get a medical!
Private pilot only need medical cert class 3? i think the correct one is class 2 and for commercial pilot, medical cert class 1 is needed.
for color deficiency people, is it possible to get medical class one? if according to this page, class two medical cert also can get commercial pilot licence?? thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.82.17.210 ( talk) 14:27, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
I thought that actually flying as the pilot of a plane carrying passengers for hire with an air carrier requires a Class 1 medical. Given the discussion here I am withdrawing my edit until I know for certain. Es330td ( talk) 20:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Found it. 61.23 Es330td ( talk) 20:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
I pulled this back out as it's redundant to later in the article (in 1st class medical). Also, earning an ATP has nothing to do with any particular medical certificate, so its not even relevant in that section, anyway. -- ChadScott ( talk) 23:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
The type rating article redirected here for no obvious reason, so I've started it as a seperate article now. BabyNuke 12:00, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
The medical certificate example indicates the holder is 5 years old, a little young to be flying. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.126.140.137 ( talk) 16:55, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Correct me if I am wrong, but an ATP does not require an instrument rating. An unrestricted commercial (with instrument) is required to take the ATP ride, but there is no "ATP instrument rating". In addition, it is probably worth noting that a large emphasis of the ATP is instrument / cross-country operations and that certain categories (LTA, glider, weight-shift) have no rating above commercial. 66.60.188.7 ( talk) 16:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Christopher
Why isn't there a section for CFI under the "Pilot Certificates" heading?
If appropriate, it would look something like this:
Certified Flight Instructor (CFI)
Although usually placed between Commercial and ATP certificates, the CFI is not a prerequisite to an ATP. An ATP can, however, be used as a prerequisite to a CFI.
In order to hold a Certified Flight Instructor certificate a pilot must hold at least an unrestricted Commercial certificate (Commercial with Instrument rating) in the appropriate category and class.
Flight instructor candidates must pass a written test for each category and class, just like any other rating (i.e. "Flight Instructor - Airplane Single Engine Land"). In addition, flight instructors must pass the "Fundamentals of Instructing" (FOI) written test at least once. In lieu of the FOI, an accredited teaching credential at 7th grade or higher or a professorship at an accredited university may be substituted.
On the CFI check ride, the applicant is required to "teach" (demonstrate to the examiner how they would teach) those maneuvers required for the private and commercial certificate. In addition, CFIs (for single engine airplanes) are required to demonstrate several additional maneuvers, such as cross control stalls. Finally, the CFI candidate must have logged actual training in spins, including the actual spinning of an aircraft. CFI is the only certificate for which the applicant must have actually spun an aircraft (as opposed to talking about it).
By default, a CFI can only instruct in VMC. To instruct in IMC a Certified Flight Instructor - Instrument (CFI-I or just "double I") must be obtained. The CFI-I places significant emphasis on positive aircraft control and controlling student mistakes while in IMC.
Some categories of aircraft (such as lighter than air) do not have a CFI (or ATP) rating. Instead, any appropriately rated commercial pilot can engage in flight training and provide log book endorsements. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.60.188.7 ( talk) 16:45, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 66.60.188.7 ( talk) 16:47, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Christopher
I've started to overhaul the General structure of certification section to bring it up to date with 2009 regulations, simplify the language, eliminate redundancy and try to clarify the relationships between privilege level, category, class, type and instrument ratings. There's a lot more work to do, including making citations more articulate and correcting stale references to certain ultralights not requiring pilot certificates; this changed upon the advent of LSA & the Sport Pilot certificate. Further, subsequent sections contain redundant and sometimes stale information requiring attention as well. I'll get back to it eventually, but if you're feeling inspired, please have at it. Jim Ward ( talk) 20:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
The recreational section needs expanding and more detail, or more detail about the differences between it and sport. 76.66.192.144 ( talk) 05:28, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
As "Commercial astronaut" is not a pilot certificate offered by FAA today, I propose striking this section. Comments? Jim Ward ( talk· stalk) 01:02, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
I have a question. If say, someone obtained a Private Pilot License at the age of 18 or 17, then went on to Annapolis, graduated, became a Navy officer, and then trained to fly say Navy fighter jets and is currently a naval aviator flying Super Hornets, is he allowed to fly privately complex airplanes or to fly under instrument meteorological conditions, or at night? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omulurimaru ( talk • contribs) 18:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
I understand this is not a forum, I'm not a n00b. However it seems to me it's evident that it's RELEVANT TO THE ARTICLE whether military qualifications apply to civilian flight as well or military pilots must acquire civilian qualifications separately. I haven't asked the question because I have nothing better to do, I asked it because I couldn't find the relevant information in the article. The informtion could potentially be added to the article as it is part of the article's scope. I belive it should have been self-evident that I'm not asking the question in order to make conversation, but to discuss something that could and should be added to the article and also that there might be others out there who might have found the article lacking due to the absence of such information.
Answer: FAR 61.73 [1] states when and how civil airmen's certificates and/or ratings may be issued based on relevant military experience. As your question is exactly phrased, the answer is "No, the pilot would not be able to fly complex airplanes or fly in IMC, just because they possess equivalent or superior military experience". This would change to "Yes" when the appropriate endorsements and/or ratings were added to that pilot's civil logbook and/or civil airman's certificate.
Anyone want to work this into the article?
198.231.23.240 ( talk) 20:54, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Both of the bolded statements below are incorrect:
Sport Pilots are only eligible to fly aircraft that are either certified specifically as light-sport aircraft (LSA) or were certified prior to the LSA regulations and are within the maximum weight and performance limitations of light-sport aircraft.
The date of certification of an aircraft is not relevant to that aircraft's eligibility to be flown by a person holding a sport pilot airmen's certificate. One example would be an aircraft issued an Experimental Amateur Built airworthiness certificate today. If that aircraft also meets all the definitions of a light sport aircraft, then a person holding a light sport pilot airmen's certificate, and/or a person holding a different airmen's certificate who chooses to operate within the restrictions of a light sport pilot airmen's certificate [1], may legally fly that aircraft [2].
The statement regarding "weight and performance" is incomplete. It would perhaps be better to use the phrase "meets the definition of a Light Sport Aircraft" and have the last three words link to either the relevant wikipedia article or the FAR definition itself [3]
Putting this on talk for people to cross-check. If no one objects (or beats me to it, hint, hint), I will edit these changes in a couple of weeks.
198.231.23.240 ( talk) 20:47, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pilot certification in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I rember someone telling me that you can fly with an instructor and log hours before turning 16, some recomend starting at 14 or 14 and a half. Is there a minimum age to log hours? -- Rcopley ( talk) 11:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Can anyone identify the source where for the information that spells out each category/class recognized by the FAA? I'm working on a project where I need to know each category/class combo that exists, and I can't find any info anywhere in FAA publications. 72.191.163.46 ( talk) 20:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Funny you should ask, I've been looking for that very thing for quite some time now, and I just recently found it. 61.5 in the FARs "certificates issued under this part". Can be found at: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=fe883b51b410ca933863b67eb94fd3d7&rgn=div8&view=text&node=14:2.0.1.1.2.1.1.4&idno=14
24.22.24.208 ( talk) 21:50, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Could we clarify the reference to judicial action being required to revoke a 'license' ? Nowhere in 14 CFR is reference made to the term 'license' except in connection with a US driver's license, and a 'foreign pilot license' (presumably because of terminology used in ICAO Annex 1). The FAA has no basis for talking about any other sort of license. ( weirpwoer ( talk) 10:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)).
This section doesn't make sense. Certificates don't have categories, ratings do. My certificate isn't in the airplane category, I have a certificate with a rating for airplanes. Not quite sure how to fix this so I'm just complaining. :-) -- Captaindan 18:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
It has been suggested that Flight instruction (US) be merged into this article or section.
Agree - that article is ugly and this article has all the same information.
Joblio
19:59, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Agree - I will work on this as time allows
ChadScott
05:04, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Completed!
ChadScott
04:27, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
The statement, "To obtain a certificate or add a rating, a pilot usually has to undergo..." confuses me. Under what situations would a pilot NOT have to undergo training with an instructor and log the relevant aeronautical experience to obtain an additional certificate or rating? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ChadScott ( talk • contribs) 19:28, 4 February 2006 (UTC).
The article is US specific, and all of the rest of the certificates ( Private Pilot Licence, Commercial Pilot Licence, etc.) are basically disambiguation pages that point to how pilots are licenced by country. McNeight 23:43, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
It appears that a bit of Recreational Pilot rules slipped in here by mistake. As of July 10, 2009, Sport Pilots are still limited to 10,000 feet MSL, with no 2000 feet AGL exception. See 61.315(c)(11) for details. This was an error in an edit of December 13, 2008 that said that the limit was the max of the two altitudes. Unless someone can quote an exception to the rules that has been published by the FAA, it would seem best to revert that change back to simply 10,000 feet MSL. Alan Larson ( talk) 22:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
By Chris Chlumsky on 12/18/09:
I contacted the legal department at AOPA to determine the validity of the 2,000 AGL portion, and am told by that authority that this is in error. The limit of 10,000 MSL is absolute. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.137.10.187 ( talk) 06:23, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
By James M (bystander, potential pilot): The 2000AGL reference still seems to be there. Living near the Sierras, this is an interesting/useful item. Appreciate the work everyone, this has been helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.234.23 ( talk) 23:49, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Will the anon who keeps adding completely ridiculous B.S. like "must pass high school with physics and mathematics" and "Class I medical by approved doctor" to the Commercial section please explain him- or herself? There is absolutely NOTHING anywhere in Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 61, that addresses such specific education requirements, and commercial pilots are *explicitly* required to hold only a second-class medical.-- chris. lawson 02:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
You are only required to hold a 3rd class medical for any checkride, and no medical at all if the checkride is accomplished in an "approved flight training device". See preamble to COM and ATP/TR PTS 66.60.188.7 ( talk) 16:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Christopher
I think Pilot Journey (www.pilotjourney.com) really should be added to external links. The site has the largest, most up to date list of flight schools AND Pilot Journey's Discovery Flight program is now larger than Be a Pilots with over 1000 coupons issued each month. -Gary
PilotOutlook.com has detailed information on these licenses. If you wish, you can add a link for it here - Rajat
I see a lot of edits where people are adding the qualifier, "...in the United States..." This article *is* about how the certification structure, process, and qualifications are in the United States, so it's a redundant qualifier. So, stop doing that. :) ChadScott 18:11, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Is there any possibility to aquire this rating fully or in parts with a Aircam plane [1] ?
Just found an article about the history of this plane: Leza-Lockwood Company 84.173.213.112 12:49, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi... I am 16 years old and i wish to know if i am able to be a pilot. I wear glases... My dioptry is: -0.5 on both eyes
correctable to 20/20 must be 17 years of age to be a private pilot. Then go get a medical!
Private pilot only need medical cert class 3? i think the correct one is class 2 and for commercial pilot, medical cert class 1 is needed.
for color deficiency people, is it possible to get medical class one? if according to this page, class two medical cert also can get commercial pilot licence?? thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.82.17.210 ( talk) 14:27, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
I thought that actually flying as the pilot of a plane carrying passengers for hire with an air carrier requires a Class 1 medical. Given the discussion here I am withdrawing my edit until I know for certain. Es330td ( talk) 20:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Found it. 61.23 Es330td ( talk) 20:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
I pulled this back out as it's redundant to later in the article (in 1st class medical). Also, earning an ATP has nothing to do with any particular medical certificate, so its not even relevant in that section, anyway. -- ChadScott ( talk) 23:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
The type rating article redirected here for no obvious reason, so I've started it as a seperate article now. BabyNuke 12:00, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
The medical certificate example indicates the holder is 5 years old, a little young to be flying. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.126.140.137 ( talk) 16:55, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Correct me if I am wrong, but an ATP does not require an instrument rating. An unrestricted commercial (with instrument) is required to take the ATP ride, but there is no "ATP instrument rating". In addition, it is probably worth noting that a large emphasis of the ATP is instrument / cross-country operations and that certain categories (LTA, glider, weight-shift) have no rating above commercial. 66.60.188.7 ( talk) 16:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Christopher
Why isn't there a section for CFI under the "Pilot Certificates" heading?
If appropriate, it would look something like this:
Certified Flight Instructor (CFI)
Although usually placed between Commercial and ATP certificates, the CFI is not a prerequisite to an ATP. An ATP can, however, be used as a prerequisite to a CFI.
In order to hold a Certified Flight Instructor certificate a pilot must hold at least an unrestricted Commercial certificate (Commercial with Instrument rating) in the appropriate category and class.
Flight instructor candidates must pass a written test for each category and class, just like any other rating (i.e. "Flight Instructor - Airplane Single Engine Land"). In addition, flight instructors must pass the "Fundamentals of Instructing" (FOI) written test at least once. In lieu of the FOI, an accredited teaching credential at 7th grade or higher or a professorship at an accredited university may be substituted.
On the CFI check ride, the applicant is required to "teach" (demonstrate to the examiner how they would teach) those maneuvers required for the private and commercial certificate. In addition, CFIs (for single engine airplanes) are required to demonstrate several additional maneuvers, such as cross control stalls. Finally, the CFI candidate must have logged actual training in spins, including the actual spinning of an aircraft. CFI is the only certificate for which the applicant must have actually spun an aircraft (as opposed to talking about it).
By default, a CFI can only instruct in VMC. To instruct in IMC a Certified Flight Instructor - Instrument (CFI-I or just "double I") must be obtained. The CFI-I places significant emphasis on positive aircraft control and controlling student mistakes while in IMC.
Some categories of aircraft (such as lighter than air) do not have a CFI (or ATP) rating. Instead, any appropriately rated commercial pilot can engage in flight training and provide log book endorsements. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.60.188.7 ( talk) 16:45, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 66.60.188.7 ( talk) 16:47, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Christopher
I've started to overhaul the General structure of certification section to bring it up to date with 2009 regulations, simplify the language, eliminate redundancy and try to clarify the relationships between privilege level, category, class, type and instrument ratings. There's a lot more work to do, including making citations more articulate and correcting stale references to certain ultralights not requiring pilot certificates; this changed upon the advent of LSA & the Sport Pilot certificate. Further, subsequent sections contain redundant and sometimes stale information requiring attention as well. I'll get back to it eventually, but if you're feeling inspired, please have at it. Jim Ward ( talk) 20:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
The recreational section needs expanding and more detail, or more detail about the differences between it and sport. 76.66.192.144 ( talk) 05:28, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
As "Commercial astronaut" is not a pilot certificate offered by FAA today, I propose striking this section. Comments? Jim Ward ( talk· stalk) 01:02, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
I have a question. If say, someone obtained a Private Pilot License at the age of 18 or 17, then went on to Annapolis, graduated, became a Navy officer, and then trained to fly say Navy fighter jets and is currently a naval aviator flying Super Hornets, is he allowed to fly privately complex airplanes or to fly under instrument meteorological conditions, or at night? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omulurimaru ( talk • contribs) 18:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
I understand this is not a forum, I'm not a n00b. However it seems to me it's evident that it's RELEVANT TO THE ARTICLE whether military qualifications apply to civilian flight as well or military pilots must acquire civilian qualifications separately. I haven't asked the question because I have nothing better to do, I asked it because I couldn't find the relevant information in the article. The informtion could potentially be added to the article as it is part of the article's scope. I belive it should have been self-evident that I'm not asking the question in order to make conversation, but to discuss something that could and should be added to the article and also that there might be others out there who might have found the article lacking due to the absence of such information.
Answer: FAR 61.73 [1] states when and how civil airmen's certificates and/or ratings may be issued based on relevant military experience. As your question is exactly phrased, the answer is "No, the pilot would not be able to fly complex airplanes or fly in IMC, just because they possess equivalent or superior military experience". This would change to "Yes" when the appropriate endorsements and/or ratings were added to that pilot's civil logbook and/or civil airman's certificate.
Anyone want to work this into the article?
198.231.23.240 ( talk) 20:54, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Both of the bolded statements below are incorrect:
Sport Pilots are only eligible to fly aircraft that are either certified specifically as light-sport aircraft (LSA) or were certified prior to the LSA regulations and are within the maximum weight and performance limitations of light-sport aircraft.
The date of certification of an aircraft is not relevant to that aircraft's eligibility to be flown by a person holding a sport pilot airmen's certificate. One example would be an aircraft issued an Experimental Amateur Built airworthiness certificate today. If that aircraft also meets all the definitions of a light sport aircraft, then a person holding a light sport pilot airmen's certificate, and/or a person holding a different airmen's certificate who chooses to operate within the restrictions of a light sport pilot airmen's certificate [1], may legally fly that aircraft [2].
The statement regarding "weight and performance" is incomplete. It would perhaps be better to use the phrase "meets the definition of a Light Sport Aircraft" and have the last three words link to either the relevant wikipedia article or the FAR definition itself [3]
Putting this on talk for people to cross-check. If no one objects (or beats me to it, hint, hint), I will edit these changes in a couple of weeks.
198.231.23.240 ( talk) 20:47, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pilot certification in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)