From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks so much for creating this article! I'm not sure if [1] or [2] are reliable, though—are there any other sources available, maybe in encyclopedias for instance?.

AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 20:52, 7 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your message. The third source is undoubtedly the most reliable but the other two are consistent with it. I rejected other sources that were largely repetitious but more or less consistent. The first source is a website that is a project from the Portuguese Association of Women in Science, so I believe that can also be regarded as reliable. Roundtheworld ( talk) 21:37, 7 October 2020 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks so much for creating this article! I'm not sure if [1] or [2] are reliable, though—are there any other sources available, maybe in encyclopedias for instance?.

AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 20:52, 7 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your message. The third source is undoubtedly the most reliable but the other two are consistent with it. I rejected other sources that were largely repetitious but more or less consistent. The first source is a website that is a project from the Portuguese Association of Women in Science, so I believe that can also be regarded as reliable. Roundtheworld ( talk) 21:37, 7 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook