 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
This page should not be speedy deleted because while its subject is a specific company, its content does not endorse or advertise said entity and having a company as its subject alone is not reason for deletion. The page has been well cited, most from credible outside news sources. The article includes a variety of links back to other Wikipedia articles, and it has been categorized properly. Together that means the Pikimal page should fit well into the Wiki community as a credible source of information about the company and decision engines in general.
BrewingII ( talk) 21:04, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
- I removed my speedy nomination; per your changes and WP:AGF I am willing to accept that the goal of this page is not advertising. The page needs better third-party sourcing; so far there are primary sources and a local biz journal. VQuakr ( talk) 21:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
| This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
This page should not be speedy deleted because while its subject is a specific company, its content does not endorse or advertise said entity and having a company as its subject alone is not reason for deletion. The page has been well cited, most from credible outside news sources. The article includes a variety of links back to other Wikipedia articles, and it has been categorized properly. Together that means the Pikimal page should fit well into the Wiki community as a credible source of information about the company and decision engines in general.
BrewingII ( talk) 21:04, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
- I removed my speedy nomination; per your changes and WP:AGF I am willing to accept that the goal of this page is not advertising. The page needs better third-party sourcing; so far there are primary sources and a local biz journal. VQuakr ( talk) 21:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)