This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Pierre Kory article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully. |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article. If you've come here in response to such recruitment, please review the relevant Wikipedia policy on recruitment of editors, as well as the neutral point of view policy. Disputes on Wikipedia are resolved by consensus, not by majority vote. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
A note on WP:MEDRS: Per this Wikipedia policy, we must rely on the highest quality secondary sources and the recommendations of professional organizations and government bodies when determining the scientific consensus about medical treatments.
Evidence of efficacy for ivermectin is inconclusive. It should not be used outside of clinical trials.( May 2021, June 2021, June 2021, July 2021, July 2021) ( WHO, FDA, IDSA, ASHP, CDC, NIH)
Neither hydroxychloroquine nor chloroquine should be used, either alone or in combination with azithromycin, in inpatient or outpatient settings.( July 2020, Aug 2020, Sep 2020, May 2021) ( WHO, FDA, IDSA, ASHP, NIH)
Please do not state that Dr. Kory was wrong about Ivermectin. 172.87.11.215 ( talk) 21:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
I agree with you about Ivermectin and Kory in general but what u said here is not the case.as far as I can tell. You have a link? All I could find was their emergency warning from 2021.
https://emergency.cdc.gov/han/2021/pdf/CDC_HAN_449.pdf JustinReilly ( talk) 17:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The introductory paragraph states: “Kory erroneously claimed that the antiparasitic medication ivermectin was a "wonder drug" with "miraculous effectiveness" against COVID-19.” Why is the word erroneous even used to describe his statement? That is someone’s personal opinion, not a fact. -Below are two studies with more than 175 citations that provide research supporting the use of Ivermectin. There are more studies available. Even the CDC’s website claims that the studies they chose to cherry pick showed patients treated with Ivermectin had a lower risk of mortality (1.2%-4.0%). 2.8 more lives saved is significant. -One study claims “All patients in the ivermectin group were successfully discharged. In comparison the same for the placebo group was observed to be 93%. This difference was found to be statistically significant(RR: 1.1; 95% CI; 1.0-1.2; p=0.045).” -Whether people agree or disagree with Dr. Kory is irrelevant. There is data out there supporting his comments which means this article is erroneously claiming the doctors statements were erroneous.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33592050/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34265236/ WhowinsIwins ( talk) 14:23, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Obviously, Dr. Kory and many others have had extensive success using ivermectin and corticosteroids. The detractors of his documented successes are corporate hacks on the dole of big pharma. 96.28.179.219 ( talk) 16:05, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
ABIM acts against Kory and Marik: [1] -- Hob Gadling ( talk) 07:56, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
This page about Pierre Kory reads like something out of communist Russia in 1980.
Pierre Kory *did not* promote misinformation during Covid.
Ivermectin is extremely effective against Covid viruses. Many studies support this.
This page looks like its been edited by Pfizer's marketing department. It's sickening. Does anyone in America tell the truth anymore??? Rjb555 ( talk) 06:18, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
This whole page needs to be redone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjb555 ( talk • contribs) 06:20, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Pierre Kory article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully. |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article. If you've come here in response to such recruitment, please review the relevant Wikipedia policy on recruitment of editors, as well as the neutral point of view policy. Disputes on Wikipedia are resolved by consensus, not by majority vote. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
A note on WP:MEDRS: Per this Wikipedia policy, we must rely on the highest quality secondary sources and the recommendations of professional organizations and government bodies when determining the scientific consensus about medical treatments.
Evidence of efficacy for ivermectin is inconclusive. It should not be used outside of clinical trials.( May 2021, June 2021, June 2021, July 2021, July 2021) ( WHO, FDA, IDSA, ASHP, CDC, NIH)
Neither hydroxychloroquine nor chloroquine should be used, either alone or in combination with azithromycin, in inpatient or outpatient settings.( July 2020, Aug 2020, Sep 2020, May 2021) ( WHO, FDA, IDSA, ASHP, NIH)
Please do not state that Dr. Kory was wrong about Ivermectin. 172.87.11.215 ( talk) 21:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
I agree with you about Ivermectin and Kory in general but what u said here is not the case.as far as I can tell. You have a link? All I could find was their emergency warning from 2021.
https://emergency.cdc.gov/han/2021/pdf/CDC_HAN_449.pdf JustinReilly ( talk) 17:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The introductory paragraph states: “Kory erroneously claimed that the antiparasitic medication ivermectin was a "wonder drug" with "miraculous effectiveness" against COVID-19.” Why is the word erroneous even used to describe his statement? That is someone’s personal opinion, not a fact. -Below are two studies with more than 175 citations that provide research supporting the use of Ivermectin. There are more studies available. Even the CDC’s website claims that the studies they chose to cherry pick showed patients treated with Ivermectin had a lower risk of mortality (1.2%-4.0%). 2.8 more lives saved is significant. -One study claims “All patients in the ivermectin group were successfully discharged. In comparison the same for the placebo group was observed to be 93%. This difference was found to be statistically significant(RR: 1.1; 95% CI; 1.0-1.2; p=0.045).” -Whether people agree or disagree with Dr. Kory is irrelevant. There is data out there supporting his comments which means this article is erroneously claiming the doctors statements were erroneous.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33592050/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34265236/ WhowinsIwins ( talk) 14:23, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Obviously, Dr. Kory and many others have had extensive success using ivermectin and corticosteroids. The detractors of his documented successes are corporate hacks on the dole of big pharma. 96.28.179.219 ( talk) 16:05, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
ABIM acts against Kory and Marik: [1] -- Hob Gadling ( talk) 07:56, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
This page about Pierre Kory reads like something out of communist Russia in 1980.
Pierre Kory *did not* promote misinformation during Covid.
Ivermectin is extremely effective against Covid viruses. Many studies support this.
This page looks like its been edited by Pfizer's marketing department. It's sickening. Does anyone in America tell the truth anymore??? Rjb555 ( talk) 06:18, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
This whole page needs to be redone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjb555 ( talk • contribs) 06:20, 22 October 2023 (UTC)