![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I was bothered by the description of this as "egg-shaped" in the text, because the same article's 3-view seems to show clearly a hexagonal sided fuselage, albeit with a rounded (very short) deck. I've gone with the text rather than my reading of the diagram, but if anyone has a better photo than the one in Pedrelli, which shows the PC.300 on the ground and uncovered, feedback is welcome. TSRL ( talk) 17:04, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I was bothered by the description of this as "egg-shaped" in the text, because the same article's 3-view seems to show clearly a hexagonal sided fuselage, albeit with a rounded (very short) deck. I've gone with the text rather than my reading of the diagram, but if anyone has a better photo than the one in Pedrelli, which shows the PC.300 on the ground and uncovered, feedback is welcome. TSRL ( talk) 17:04, 20 October 2013 (UTC)