This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dua Lipa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Dua Lipa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Dua LipaWikipedia:WikiProject Dua LipaTemplate:WikiProject Dua LipaDua Lipa articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gwen Stefani, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Gwen Stefani on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gwen StefaniWikipedia:WikiProject Gwen StefaniTemplate:WikiProject Gwen StefaniGwen Stefani articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Physical (Dua Lipa song) is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the
welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our
open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
I don't find any results for this article on English Wikipedia when trying to search for it on Google, which means that this article failed to gain popularity outside Wikipedia. I therefore wants this article to be deleted. Please discuss the deletion
here.
Karamellpudding1999 (
talk)
08:31, 6 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Genres
For future reference, here is what the majority of sources have said:
LOVI33, Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination is one of the first lines on the
WP:GAI page. I can’t see any public record of a consultation between the nominator and article contributors.—NØ14:37, 11 June 2020 (UTC)reply
LOVI33, Username6892 have one edit to the article which is a revert. It would be highly recommended they consult one of the top 10 contributors to the article prior to a nomination. This really isn’t hard to understand.—NØ14:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)reply
It does look like Coolmarc has retired for real this time. Since he is disproportionately the only major contributor of this article, and cannot be approached for his permission, U6892 may proceed with the nomination. For future reference, the latter is not permitted to nominate it at FAC due to the lack of contributions.—NØ09:44, 13 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
This review may come in stages of sorts because the article is very large, so if I add an edit only mentioning certain sections, that will not be the end of the review. --
Kyle Peake (
talk)
07:29, 23 June 2020 (UTC)reply
"Elsewhere, "Physical" reached number one" → "Elsewhere, the track reached number one"
"and peaked in the top ten in sixteen" → "and peaked in the top 10 of 16"
Are you sure these positions shouldn't be ordered with the number one/top 10 sentence first, followed by UK then US? I may be incorrect, but feel free to comment.
This was
coolmarc's original nom (I renominated after they retired), so I decided to check
another GA for clarification. It put the number ones first, so I decided to reorder the positions accordingly. Username689215:49, 23 June 2020 (UTC)reply
"was released the following day" → "was shared on January 24 of that year"
"with contrasting coloured" → "that has contrasting coloured"
"on 25 January 2020" → "the following day"
"premiered as the album's second single" → "was released for
digital download and
streaming as the album's second
single" with the targets
"Lipa gave her first live performance" → "Lipa delivered her first live performance"
"was released on Spotify" → "was released via Spotify"
"On 17 March 2020, a remix featuring South Korean singer
Hwasa" → "On 17 March of that year, a remix of the song, featuring South Korean singer
Hwasa,"
"It features Hwasa singing" → "The remix includes Hwasa singing"
"had a 30% sales increase and rose to a peak of number three with sales of" → "experienced a 30% sales increase and peaked at number three, selling"
"and Lipa's other single" → "and Lipa's single"
Add release year of "Break My Heart" in brackets
"also charted in the top 10 that week" → "also reached the top 10 of the chart that week"
"since
Vera Lynn in 1952 to have three songs chart simultaneously in the top 10" → "to have three songs chart simultaneously in the top 10 since
Vera Lynn in 1952"
"Lipa was the fifth female" → "Lipa became the fifth female"
"to achieve this after Lynn" → "to achieve this, following on from Lynn"
"in the UK" → "of the UK Singles Chart"
"for track-equivalent sales of 400,000 units" → "for track-equivalent sales of 400,000 units in the United Kingdom"
"where it peaked at number two" → "and peaked at number two"
"and favoured deceptive" → "while also favoured deceptive"
"is shortlisted for" → "is shortlisted for both"
Remove the last sentence, since YouTube is constantly updating and if a written source hasn't mentioned views, then you are technically inflating success.
Wikilinks and targets on the names should be added at all points when possible, including the lead artist
Use {{
spaced ndash}} so there is the right space between credits and personnel
Done
Charts
Weekly charts
Why is there an empty |- under here?
Removed
Are you sure the Bulgaria pick is correct since that is from "The world TOP 10"?
Removed It's not
Where do I access the chart position for Tophit ref?
For the first one, the chart history is on the first graph on the right. For the other 2, the song can be found by scrolling down through the chart. Username689201:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Are you sure the Czech Radio chart should be included?
Is there an MOS Chart guideline that is against including this?
Are you sure ref 19 is reliable per
WP:TWITTER? Also, cite
Twitter as publisher instead if you keep this.
I think this is the only thing I have left to do and I'm still undecided on this. I invite you to review the lead text I recently added for the music video's reception. Username689201:55, 26 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Username6892 Did some copy editing of the music video text in lead, plus ref 19 should be removed or replaced (preferably the latter) since that tweet is from a fan account. Also, the various citation is incorrect and should be laid out like "
All Day" instead. --
Kyle Peake (
talk)
07:08, 26 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Remove wikilinks on Twitter for refs 24, 28, 31 and 80; same for ref 23 if ref 19 is kept
The wikilink to twitter appears to be part of the template {{
cite tweet}}
Cite Inquisitr as publisher instead for ref 25
MOS:CAPS issues with ref 26 and remove wikilink on Twitter
Ref 37 should cite various iTunes of countries, since that release was apparently various
From the sample of countries I saw on iTunes, all said 25 March, which is leading me to believe that all the countries show the original date. Username689220:54, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
@
Username6892: sure no worries on the picture it was just an idea, this is close to passing now, could you add the source to ALT1a and actually now I notice "Physical" needs the apostrophes in the other ALTs as well
Mujinga (
talk)
15:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dua Lipa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Dua Lipa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Dua LipaWikipedia:WikiProject Dua LipaTemplate:WikiProject Dua LipaDua Lipa articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gwen Stefani, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Gwen Stefani on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gwen StefaniWikipedia:WikiProject Gwen StefaniTemplate:WikiProject Gwen StefaniGwen Stefani articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Physical (Dua Lipa song) is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the
welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our
open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
I don't find any results for this article on English Wikipedia when trying to search for it on Google, which means that this article failed to gain popularity outside Wikipedia. I therefore wants this article to be deleted. Please discuss the deletion
here.
Karamellpudding1999 (
talk)
08:31, 6 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Genres
For future reference, here is what the majority of sources have said:
LOVI33, Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination is one of the first lines on the
WP:GAI page. I can’t see any public record of a consultation between the nominator and article contributors.—NØ14:37, 11 June 2020 (UTC)reply
LOVI33, Username6892 have one edit to the article which is a revert. It would be highly recommended they consult one of the top 10 contributors to the article prior to a nomination. This really isn’t hard to understand.—NØ14:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)reply
It does look like Coolmarc has retired for real this time. Since he is disproportionately the only major contributor of this article, and cannot be approached for his permission, U6892 may proceed with the nomination. For future reference, the latter is not permitted to nominate it at FAC due to the lack of contributions.—NØ09:44, 13 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
This review may come in stages of sorts because the article is very large, so if I add an edit only mentioning certain sections, that will not be the end of the review. --
Kyle Peake (
talk)
07:29, 23 June 2020 (UTC)reply
"Elsewhere, "Physical" reached number one" → "Elsewhere, the track reached number one"
"and peaked in the top ten in sixteen" → "and peaked in the top 10 of 16"
Are you sure these positions shouldn't be ordered with the number one/top 10 sentence first, followed by UK then US? I may be incorrect, but feel free to comment.
This was
coolmarc's original nom (I renominated after they retired), so I decided to check
another GA for clarification. It put the number ones first, so I decided to reorder the positions accordingly. Username689215:49, 23 June 2020 (UTC)reply
"was released the following day" → "was shared on January 24 of that year"
"with contrasting coloured" → "that has contrasting coloured"
"on 25 January 2020" → "the following day"
"premiered as the album's second single" → "was released for
digital download and
streaming as the album's second
single" with the targets
"Lipa gave her first live performance" → "Lipa delivered her first live performance"
"was released on Spotify" → "was released via Spotify"
"On 17 March 2020, a remix featuring South Korean singer
Hwasa" → "On 17 March of that year, a remix of the song, featuring South Korean singer
Hwasa,"
"It features Hwasa singing" → "The remix includes Hwasa singing"
"had a 30% sales increase and rose to a peak of number three with sales of" → "experienced a 30% sales increase and peaked at number three, selling"
"and Lipa's other single" → "and Lipa's single"
Add release year of "Break My Heart" in brackets
"also charted in the top 10 that week" → "also reached the top 10 of the chart that week"
"since
Vera Lynn in 1952 to have three songs chart simultaneously in the top 10" → "to have three songs chart simultaneously in the top 10 since
Vera Lynn in 1952"
"Lipa was the fifth female" → "Lipa became the fifth female"
"to achieve this after Lynn" → "to achieve this, following on from Lynn"
"in the UK" → "of the UK Singles Chart"
"for track-equivalent sales of 400,000 units" → "for track-equivalent sales of 400,000 units in the United Kingdom"
"where it peaked at number two" → "and peaked at number two"
"and favoured deceptive" → "while also favoured deceptive"
"is shortlisted for" → "is shortlisted for both"
Remove the last sentence, since YouTube is constantly updating and if a written source hasn't mentioned views, then you are technically inflating success.
Wikilinks and targets on the names should be added at all points when possible, including the lead artist
Use {{
spaced ndash}} so there is the right space between credits and personnel
Done
Charts
Weekly charts
Why is there an empty |- under here?
Removed
Are you sure the Bulgaria pick is correct since that is from "The world TOP 10"?
Removed It's not
Where do I access the chart position for Tophit ref?
For the first one, the chart history is on the first graph on the right. For the other 2, the song can be found by scrolling down through the chart. Username689201:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Are you sure the Czech Radio chart should be included?
Is there an MOS Chart guideline that is against including this?
Are you sure ref 19 is reliable per
WP:TWITTER? Also, cite
Twitter as publisher instead if you keep this.
I think this is the only thing I have left to do and I'm still undecided on this. I invite you to review the lead text I recently added for the music video's reception. Username689201:55, 26 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Username6892 Did some copy editing of the music video text in lead, plus ref 19 should be removed or replaced (preferably the latter) since that tweet is from a fan account. Also, the various citation is incorrect and should be laid out like "
All Day" instead. --
Kyle Peake (
talk)
07:08, 26 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Remove wikilinks on Twitter for refs 24, 28, 31 and 80; same for ref 23 if ref 19 is kept
The wikilink to twitter appears to be part of the template {{
cite tweet}}
Cite Inquisitr as publisher instead for ref 25
MOS:CAPS issues with ref 26 and remove wikilink on Twitter
Ref 37 should cite various iTunes of countries, since that release was apparently various
From the sample of countries I saw on iTunes, all said 25 March, which is leading me to believe that all the countries show the original date. Username689220:54, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
@
Username6892: sure no worries on the picture it was just an idea, this is close to passing now, could you add the source to ALT1a and actually now I notice "Physical" needs the apostrophes in the other ALTs as well
Mujinga (
talk)
15:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)reply