![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 4 September 2015. The result of the discussion was merge to Alan Kurdi. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can any auto-confirmed user help move this page to "Photographs of Aylan Kurdi" or "2 September 2015 photographs of Aylan Kurdi". Only the photographs taken on 2 September 2015 are notable. Time will show if the word "corpse" is desirable or necessary to use in the article's title. -- Burst of unj ( talk) 02:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Not done
Flat Out (
talk)
04:02, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
There seems to be some foot dragging going on about moving "photos" to "photographs" in the title. I find somewhat odd a certain constellation of opinions: Someone wants the topic deleted as a seperate article. That someone also would like to wait for any renaming/moving to occur. (That same someone was willing to make a requested move, and later wanted a different title, for an article that/she wanted deleted .) Maybe someone without vested interests/or tar heels could move the title? --
Burst of unj (
talk)
10:15, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
— Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 05:18, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
When the article has a drawing/rendering with the above license - what must accompany the artwork in the article? Must text mention the name of the artist? Can the name of the photographer (who created the photograph which the artwork is a seemingly a representation of) be omitted? User LocoWiki at Commons has stated that "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: w:en:Creative Commons attribution This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license." Burst of unj ( talk) 12:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Each time the artwork gets removed with the edit remark "copyright infringement (derivate or direct capture of a copyrighted template": Is there any justification for that edit remark (and edit itself)? -- Burst of unj ( talk) 13:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
#t=XXhXXmXXs
at the end of the URL).This should be the original location where the dead body was found. -- Scrutinize13 ( talk) 15:36, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
The strongest argument for posed photos are the inconsistencies: The hotel employee says that he dragged the boy on land/gently closed his eyes. The photograph indicates that he has just drifted to shore, or that a rising tide is about to wash him out to sea. The hotel employee never said that he left Kurdi's eyes and face in the water, or in the dirt/sand. Are there any notable sources which mention the inconsistencies? Burst of unj ( talk) 10:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
You have provided the following link with photos, his Facebook page, marked by Facebook as a "Mobile Upload" from September 2. One photo has a boy in a red shirt, apparently with shorts at his ankles, lying on his back in the surf. If this is Kurdi, are there any notable sources which say who pulled his shorts from his ankles and placed them properly around his waist? Burst of unj ( talk) 08:05, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Comment Why is this even coming up for discussion? Wikipedians are not investigative journalists. Beware, good people, Burst of unj, which account was only first used on 3rd September 2015, clearly for use only on this subject, has a very obvious agenda with regard to the Alan Kurdi story. WP:NPOV is being ignored. It is fairly obvious that every contribution made by this user has the intent of throwing mud on the story and of minimising its effect. This whole subject is of the greatest importance right now and Wikipedia must avoid being taken for a ride. Boscaswell ( talk) 15:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
No insensitivity intended. Burst of unj ( talk) 13:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 4 September 2015. The result of the discussion was merge to Alan Kurdi. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can any auto-confirmed user help move this page to "Photographs of Aylan Kurdi" or "2 September 2015 photographs of Aylan Kurdi". Only the photographs taken on 2 September 2015 are notable. Time will show if the word "corpse" is desirable or necessary to use in the article's title. -- Burst of unj ( talk) 02:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Not done
Flat Out (
talk)
04:02, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
There seems to be some foot dragging going on about moving "photos" to "photographs" in the title. I find somewhat odd a certain constellation of opinions: Someone wants the topic deleted as a seperate article. That someone also would like to wait for any renaming/moving to occur. (That same someone was willing to make a requested move, and later wanted a different title, for an article that/she wanted deleted .) Maybe someone without vested interests/or tar heels could move the title? --
Burst of unj (
talk)
10:15, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
— Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 05:18, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
When the article has a drawing/rendering with the above license - what must accompany the artwork in the article? Must text mention the name of the artist? Can the name of the photographer (who created the photograph which the artwork is a seemingly a representation of) be omitted? User LocoWiki at Commons has stated that "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: w:en:Creative Commons attribution This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license." Burst of unj ( talk) 12:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Each time the artwork gets removed with the edit remark "copyright infringement (derivate or direct capture of a copyrighted template": Is there any justification for that edit remark (and edit itself)? -- Burst of unj ( talk) 13:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
#t=XXhXXmXXs
at the end of the URL).This should be the original location where the dead body was found. -- Scrutinize13 ( talk) 15:36, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
The strongest argument for posed photos are the inconsistencies: The hotel employee says that he dragged the boy on land/gently closed his eyes. The photograph indicates that he has just drifted to shore, or that a rising tide is about to wash him out to sea. The hotel employee never said that he left Kurdi's eyes and face in the water, or in the dirt/sand. Are there any notable sources which mention the inconsistencies? Burst of unj ( talk) 10:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
You have provided the following link with photos, his Facebook page, marked by Facebook as a "Mobile Upload" from September 2. One photo has a boy in a red shirt, apparently with shorts at his ankles, lying on his back in the surf. If this is Kurdi, are there any notable sources which say who pulled his shorts from his ankles and placed them properly around his waist? Burst of unj ( talk) 08:05, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Comment Why is this even coming up for discussion? Wikipedians are not investigative journalists. Beware, good people, Burst of unj, which account was only first used on 3rd September 2015, clearly for use only on this subject, has a very obvious agenda with regard to the Alan Kurdi story. WP:NPOV is being ignored. It is fairly obvious that every contribution made by this user has the intent of throwing mud on the story and of minimising its effect. This whole subject is of the greatest importance right now and Wikipedia must avoid being taken for a ride. Boscaswell ( talk) 15:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
No insensitivity intended. Burst of unj ( talk) 13:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)