The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Are any of these genuinely notable??
"Best Retailer" at the 2008 Mobile Industry Awards.[3]
"Best National Advertising and Marketing Campaign" at the 2008 Mobile News Awards
"Employee of the Year 2010" ?
Seems to me they're not and don't deserve a place here, unless anyone knows better?
Pjbeef ( talk) 10:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Seems a good candidate for a flagged revision? Petertt ( talk) 14:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
By the tone of the article, it looks as if that a P4U employee or a PR firm working for P4U has rewrote the article!!!
-Agreed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Voodoochilli ( talk • contribs) 11:49, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
"Phones 4 U are also known for deliberately altering customer's details so that they will be more likly to be accepted by the networks when performing credit checks.
P4U also mis-sell customer's insurance, by offering them a cashback amount, free mobile phone accessories, normally a Jabra Bluetooth handset."
This needs removing or suppoted with evidence -- 88.105.28.58 11:10, 5 January 2007 (UTC) (creating account today!)
Phones 4 U mis-sold me a phone and 18m contract when all I needed was a charger. They repeatedly lied to me and fobbed me off. Don't touch them with a bargepole.
Phones 4 U are a rip-off. Their customer service is inexistent and they lie all the time. Avoid them at all costs.
I can't describe how much I DETEST those stupid idiotic adverts!! They've tried to go for the funny/surreal/random humour thing and missed the mark completely! 87.194.8.180 08:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
The adverts are good, deal with it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.172.183.147 ( talk) 11:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
I wouldn't mind some information on the previous advert campaign involving Flight of the Conchords or the actors in the current one, if anyone's got any? Vigimael ( talk) 19:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
I removed the linkspam by this editor User talk:94.72.249.26. Note this editor has been asked if they have a COI. Widefox ( talk) 12:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Perhaps a more up to date view of the company's performance regarding both its sales and customer service is needed? The sales figures (other than what I have just added) are slightly out of date and the service section doesn't really go past 2008. (please sign your comments User:94.72.249.26)
Since I've got a potential CoI on this issue I wont add it myself, however I think Phones 4u's JUMP (Just Upgrade My Phone) proposition is worth noting. It's the only one of its kind currently available in the UK and is seen as one of it's leading strategic products. Some sources are: Phones 4u's support site, Link 1, Link 2, link 3. -- RB ( talk) 23:47, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
phones 4u say its completly free to you the customer whats not in large advert on buying phones is when you reject there offer you have to pay £8 95 to get your phone back. its in the small print somewere so people beware. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.15.112.191 ( talk) 18:25, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Phones 4u. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
I did some work for these back in the 1980s. Mobile phone sales side was called "Midland Cellular". Airtime side (i.e, the people the ongoing phone service contract was with) was a distinct company called Midland Airtime Services. I never saw "Midland Mobile Phones". I will try and see if I've got any paperwork... 5.66.32.81 ( talk) 18:58, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Are any of these genuinely notable??
"Best Retailer" at the 2008 Mobile Industry Awards.[3]
"Best National Advertising and Marketing Campaign" at the 2008 Mobile News Awards
"Employee of the Year 2010" ?
Seems to me they're not and don't deserve a place here, unless anyone knows better?
Pjbeef ( talk) 10:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Seems a good candidate for a flagged revision? Petertt ( talk) 14:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
By the tone of the article, it looks as if that a P4U employee or a PR firm working for P4U has rewrote the article!!!
-Agreed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Voodoochilli ( talk • contribs) 11:49, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
"Phones 4 U are also known for deliberately altering customer's details so that they will be more likly to be accepted by the networks when performing credit checks.
P4U also mis-sell customer's insurance, by offering them a cashback amount, free mobile phone accessories, normally a Jabra Bluetooth handset."
This needs removing or suppoted with evidence -- 88.105.28.58 11:10, 5 January 2007 (UTC) (creating account today!)
Phones 4 U mis-sold me a phone and 18m contract when all I needed was a charger. They repeatedly lied to me and fobbed me off. Don't touch them with a bargepole.
Phones 4 U are a rip-off. Their customer service is inexistent and they lie all the time. Avoid them at all costs.
I can't describe how much I DETEST those stupid idiotic adverts!! They've tried to go for the funny/surreal/random humour thing and missed the mark completely! 87.194.8.180 08:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
The adverts are good, deal with it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.172.183.147 ( talk) 11:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
I wouldn't mind some information on the previous advert campaign involving Flight of the Conchords or the actors in the current one, if anyone's got any? Vigimael ( talk) 19:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
I removed the linkspam by this editor User talk:94.72.249.26. Note this editor has been asked if they have a COI. Widefox ( talk) 12:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Perhaps a more up to date view of the company's performance regarding both its sales and customer service is needed? The sales figures (other than what I have just added) are slightly out of date and the service section doesn't really go past 2008. (please sign your comments User:94.72.249.26)
Since I've got a potential CoI on this issue I wont add it myself, however I think Phones 4u's JUMP (Just Upgrade My Phone) proposition is worth noting. It's the only one of its kind currently available in the UK and is seen as one of it's leading strategic products. Some sources are: Phones 4u's support site, Link 1, Link 2, link 3. -- RB ( talk) 23:47, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
phones 4u say its completly free to you the customer whats not in large advert on buying phones is when you reject there offer you have to pay £8 95 to get your phone back. its in the small print somewere so people beware. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.15.112.191 ( talk) 18:25, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Phones 4u. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
I did some work for these back in the 1980s. Mobile phone sales side was called "Midland Cellular". Airtime side (i.e, the people the ongoing phone service contract was with) was a distinct company called Midland Airtime Services. I never saw "Midland Mobile Phones". I will try and see if I've got any paperwork... 5.66.32.81 ( talk) 18:58, 3 August 2017 (UTC)