![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Bwrite New Mind.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 06:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
There's nothing wrong with discussing Rosicrucian philosophy of war in this article, but right now there is no such discussion in the article itself. I don't think we should be including books under the "referrences" section which are not used as referrence in the article.
If the Rosicrucian philosophy of war is worth including in the article, then we should include a section in the article which discusses topics from the Max Heindel book and refers back to it. If it's not worth including a section on it, we should remove the book from the referrence section and either leave it out of the article entirely or possibly include it under the "external links" section. Wje 02:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
I've added the essay tag to this article. It reads like an essay about "On War" right now. It could use a more encyclopedic approach to the topic along with verifiable sources. ComputerGeezer ( talk) 00:11, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Bwrite New Mind.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 06:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
There's nothing wrong with discussing Rosicrucian philosophy of war in this article, but right now there is no such discussion in the article itself. I don't think we should be including books under the "referrences" section which are not used as referrence in the article.
If the Rosicrucian philosophy of war is worth including in the article, then we should include a section in the article which discusses topics from the Max Heindel book and refers back to it. If it's not worth including a section on it, we should remove the book from the referrence section and either leave it out of the article entirely or possibly include it under the "external links" section. Wje 02:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
I've added the essay tag to this article. It reads like an essay about "On War" right now. It could use a more encyclopedic approach to the topic along with verifiable sources. ComputerGeezer ( talk) 00:11, 2 August 2008 (UTC)