![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
This is a proposal to merge this article into Philippine general election, 2010. Both articles refer to the same event, even if the event will have two results of different nature. Moreover, the texts, as they are (April 2009) do not differ significantly. -- AVM ( talk) 21:07, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Can we use subtly different hues of green for BPM and the other one? We can use lime for BPM since their colors are yellow and green. – Howard the Duck 02:23, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
I basically ripped this off from United States Senate special election in Massachusetts, 2010:
I think it's interesting that the need to use free images has favoured some candidates while disadvantaging others. Here's how I would vote based purely on the photographic evidence available on Wikipedia:
Needless to say this is not how I'd actually vote, but appearances do have a big influence on voting decisions. -- Specrat ( talk) 01:48, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
The way it's going, it seems that only Erap and Noynoy will be left. Noynoy's margin of victory is ~15% and 3rd place Villar is ~14%. – Howard the Duck 17:03, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
{{ Editsemiprotected}}
Per MOS:SCROLL, please remove the scroll box from the References section. 86.41.61.203 ( talk) 17:18, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
If Aquino is proclaimed the winner, the infobox should look like this:
![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Final provincial canvass -- the results of these will be canvassed by Congress. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The basis for Villar being there (and the others not being there) is that his number of votes is near the margin between Aquino and Estrada, and he won two rather big provinces. The boldfaced vice-president will be depend on who wins. – Howard the Duck 17:44, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Right now, the background of the election is written in the form of a timeline. I suggest that we soon transform this into a more formal background output, similar to the one written for Philippine presidential election, 2004. The Mask ( talk) 06:26, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Philippine presidential election, 2010. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, all. I've started an RfC about Congressional canvass for the Philippine presidential election, 2016 and Congressional canvass for the Philippine presidential election, 2010 at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines#RfC on election canvass articles on whether these are violations of WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Please feel free to engage in discussion there. Thanks. Raykyogrou0 ( Talk) 07:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 19:23, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
This is a proposal to merge this article into Philippine general election, 2010. Both articles refer to the same event, even if the event will have two results of different nature. Moreover, the texts, as they are (April 2009) do not differ significantly. -- AVM ( talk) 21:07, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Can we use subtly different hues of green for BPM and the other one? We can use lime for BPM since their colors are yellow and green. – Howard the Duck 02:23, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
I basically ripped this off from United States Senate special election in Massachusetts, 2010:
I think it's interesting that the need to use free images has favoured some candidates while disadvantaging others. Here's how I would vote based purely on the photographic evidence available on Wikipedia:
Needless to say this is not how I'd actually vote, but appearances do have a big influence on voting decisions. -- Specrat ( talk) 01:48, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
The way it's going, it seems that only Erap and Noynoy will be left. Noynoy's margin of victory is ~15% and 3rd place Villar is ~14%. – Howard the Duck 17:03, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
{{ Editsemiprotected}}
Per MOS:SCROLL, please remove the scroll box from the References section. 86.41.61.203 ( talk) 17:18, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
If Aquino is proclaimed the winner, the infobox should look like this:
![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Final provincial canvass -- the results of these will be canvassed by Congress. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The basis for Villar being there (and the others not being there) is that his number of votes is near the margin between Aquino and Estrada, and he won two rather big provinces. The boldfaced vice-president will be depend on who wins. – Howard the Duck 17:44, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Right now, the background of the election is written in the form of a timeline. I suggest that we soon transform this into a more formal background output, similar to the one written for Philippine presidential election, 2004. The Mask ( talk) 06:26, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Philippine presidential election, 2010. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, all. I've started an RfC about Congressional canvass for the Philippine presidential election, 2016 and Congressional canvass for the Philippine presidential election, 2010 at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines#RfC on election canvass articles on whether these are violations of WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Please feel free to engage in discussion there. Thanks. Raykyogrou0 ( Talk) 07:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 19:23, 22 July 2022 (UTC)