This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have decided to remove this section due to the fact that it lacks any references or citations. Also, there's is a more compact mention on Philippine literature during/from the Spanish period in the History section. It just loks like a big waste of space IMO, and would be better places in the separate Wikipedia page for Philippine Literature during the Spanish period. For those who want to undo the revisions, please discuss it first in this talk page. GTALuisLopez ( talk) 03:49, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Ironically, a great amount of Spanish literature was produced after the Spanish colonial era. This was because the Americans did not suppress literature but encouraged it.
Based on my idea, Rizal showed the Filipino people how much he loved and cared about the Philippines through his literary works. If you read his novel, it may come as a shock to you. Because it is too long to read.
The link to the Good Fight is different. FadulJoseArabe ( talk) 10:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Copied from WP:RM. 199.125.109.124 ( talk) 12:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Literature of the Philippines → Philippine Literature — Manual of style on other literature pages (See British Literature, American Literature, Chinese Literature) -- Shadowjams ( talk) 04:19, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits are poorly written, unsourced and unnecessary. You need not revert to them again, but you are welcome to write better. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) ( talk) 16:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
LOVE IS LIKE AN MATH MINSAN MAHIRAP MINSAN MADALI MINSAN MASAYA MAGSAGOT NG PRBLEM SOLVING TAMA?!!! DI BA
LOVE IS LIKE A MATH-- 125.60.237.202 ( talk) 10:35, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
How can we agree on who's notable? And how can we agree on who's NOT notable and therefore ought NOT to be included in this article's Notables list? Unless we rely on Wikipedia's standards on notability, then it's easy work---anybody who is written about (raved!) by a third-party source may be deemed notable. But if our decision in these lists are to derive from some people's opinion or research or best list, then we should cite those sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.193.143.240 ( talk) 02:28, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have decided to remove this section due to the fact that it lacks any references or citations. Also, there's is a more compact mention on Philippine literature during/from the Spanish period in the History section. It just loks like a big waste of space IMO, and would be better places in the separate Wikipedia page for Philippine Literature during the Spanish period. For those who want to undo the revisions, please discuss it first in this talk page. GTALuisLopez ( talk) 03:49, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Ironically, a great amount of Spanish literature was produced after the Spanish colonial era. This was because the Americans did not suppress literature but encouraged it.
Based on my idea, Rizal showed the Filipino people how much he loved and cared about the Philippines through his literary works. If you read his novel, it may come as a shock to you. Because it is too long to read.
The link to the Good Fight is different. FadulJoseArabe ( talk) 10:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Copied from WP:RM. 199.125.109.124 ( talk) 12:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Literature of the Philippines → Philippine Literature — Manual of style on other literature pages (See British Literature, American Literature, Chinese Literature) -- Shadowjams ( talk) 04:19, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits are poorly written, unsourced and unnecessary. You need not revert to them again, but you are welcome to write better. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) ( talk) 16:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
LOVE IS LIKE AN MATH MINSAN MAHIRAP MINSAN MADALI MINSAN MASAYA MAGSAGOT NG PRBLEM SOLVING TAMA?!!! DI BA
LOVE IS LIKE A MATH-- 125.60.237.202 ( talk) 10:35, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
How can we agree on who's notable? And how can we agree on who's NOT notable and therefore ought NOT to be included in this article's Notables list? Unless we rely on Wikipedia's standards on notability, then it's easy work---anybody who is written about (raved!) by a third-party source may be deemed notable. But if our decision in these lists are to derive from some people's opinion or research or best list, then we should cite those sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.193.143.240 ( talk) 02:28, 23 February 2011 (UTC)