This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I propose merging the Debatable Space article here. At the moment, this article is little more than a single-sentence catalog entry that fails to meet WP:STUB and makes no significant claim to notability. Currently, the entire text of this article consists of the words "Debatable Space is a 2008 science fiction novel by novelist and screenwriter Philip Palmer." There is no discussion of the content of the book, or its critical reception. The only two references provided are to web-based reviews: no references to reviews in mainstream publications are provided.
As such, it needs to be either:
It would be trivial for it to be merged here, by simply adding the words "Debatable Space is a 2008 science fiction novel by novelist and screenwriter Philip Palmer." to this article. -- The Anome ( talk) 08:50, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
1. You can't find any 'mainstream' reviews of it.
2. The article contains 'only one sentence'
3. Having more articles on Wikipedia is bad!
-- jmenkus [ T 12:38, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
You're missing my point. Having more articles is good! In fact, I'd really like to see an article about this book, instead of a sub-stub.
Instead of advocating that the article be kept in spite of its current woeful state, why not make it better? For example, you could:
-- The Anome ( talk) 01:56, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I propose merging the Debatable Space article here. At the moment, this article is little more than a single-sentence catalog entry that fails to meet WP:STUB and makes no significant claim to notability. Currently, the entire text of this article consists of the words "Debatable Space is a 2008 science fiction novel by novelist and screenwriter Philip Palmer." There is no discussion of the content of the book, or its critical reception. The only two references provided are to web-based reviews: no references to reviews in mainstream publications are provided.
As such, it needs to be either:
It would be trivial for it to be merged here, by simply adding the words "Debatable Space is a 2008 science fiction novel by novelist and screenwriter Philip Palmer." to this article. -- The Anome ( talk) 08:50, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
1. You can't find any 'mainstream' reviews of it.
2. The article contains 'only one sentence'
3. Having more articles on Wikipedia is bad!
-- jmenkus [ T 12:38, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
You're missing my point. Having more articles is good! In fact, I'd really like to see an article about this book, instead of a sub-stub.
Instead of advocating that the article be kept in spite of its current woeful state, why not make it better? For example, you could:
-- The Anome ( talk) 01:56, 28 August 2010 (UTC)