This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Philip P. Barbour article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United States federal courts,
courthouses, and
United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is linked to by one or more organisations, using
QRpedia.
Statistics are available. For further information, please see
WikiProject QRpedia.QRpediaWikipedia:WikiProject QRpediaTemplate:WikiProject QRpediaQRpedia articles
Start date?
The side panel says Barbour started on March 15th (two days before he left the District Court), but the article says "on May 7, 1836, the Senate approved the appointment of Barbour". — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
67.2.60.187 (
talk) 21:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Data behind page move
The full form of his name is the least common, particularly historically. Results from HathiTrust and Newspapers.com respectively: Philip P. Barbour:
8,201 (52%) and
1,334 (40%); P. P. Barbour:
3,179 (20%) and
1,866 (56%); Philip Barbour:
3,119 (20%) and n/a (most newspaper results don't refer to subject); Philip Pendleton Barbour:
1,313 (8%) and
119 (4%). He'd also easily be the primary for
Philip Barbour, but the middle initial form seems clearly more common. The middle initial form is also used by
Oyez,
Brittanica, and
the Senate.
Star Garnet (
talk) 01:58, 3 April 2021 (UTC)reply
"Narrowed reading of state's rights"
In the section "Constitutional legacy", the article states that Barbour applied "a narrowed reading of state's rights into the Constitution". However, the section then goes on to give examples of Barbour taking a more expansive view of states' rights than the Marshall jurisprudence. Shouldn't it say that he applied "an expansive reading"?
Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (
talk) 16:54, 9 March 2022 (UTC)reply
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Philip P. Barbour article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United States federal courts,
courthouses, and
United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is linked to by one or more organisations, using
QRpedia.
Statistics are available. For further information, please see
WikiProject QRpedia.QRpediaWikipedia:WikiProject QRpediaTemplate:WikiProject QRpediaQRpedia articles
Start date?
The side panel says Barbour started on March 15th (two days before he left the District Court), but the article says "on May 7, 1836, the Senate approved the appointment of Barbour". — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
67.2.60.187 (
talk) 21:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Data behind page move
The full form of his name is the least common, particularly historically. Results from HathiTrust and Newspapers.com respectively: Philip P. Barbour:
8,201 (52%) and
1,334 (40%); P. P. Barbour:
3,179 (20%) and
1,866 (56%); Philip Barbour:
3,119 (20%) and n/a (most newspaper results don't refer to subject); Philip Pendleton Barbour:
1,313 (8%) and
119 (4%). He'd also easily be the primary for
Philip Barbour, but the middle initial form seems clearly more common. The middle initial form is also used by
Oyez,
Brittanica, and
the Senate.
Star Garnet (
talk) 01:58, 3 April 2021 (UTC)reply
"Narrowed reading of state's rights"
In the section "Constitutional legacy", the article states that Barbour applied "a narrowed reading of state's rights into the Constitution". However, the section then goes on to give examples of Barbour taking a more expansive view of states' rights than the Marshall jurisprudence. Shouldn't it say that he applied "an expansive reading"?
Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (
talk) 16:54, 9 March 2022 (UTC)reply