GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: 3family6 ( talk · contribs) 18:53, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
In the "Reign" section:
The "Legacy" section":
The referencing is good, but I think the second paragraph in "Life" could use a few more citations.
Significant writing issues throughout the article. If those are fixed, this article should be able to go forward to good article status.-- ¿3fam ily6 contribs 18:53, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
@
3family6: Done.
Jaqeli (
talk)
19:29, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
@ Jaqeli: The "Legacy" section still needs a rewrite. Also, after doing this review, I noticed that you are under a topic ban. I don't know whether this article falls within the scope of the ban or not. I requested comment from User:EdJohnston.-- ¿3fam ily6 contribs 20:37, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
@ 3family6: No it does not. This article is not under the TBAN so relax. What exactly is the problem of legacy section? Jaqeli ( talk) 20:40, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
@ Jaqeli: Forgive me for not taking your word for it, but I will wait for comment as to whether or not this falls under the ban. As for the "Legacy" section:
@
3family6: Done
Jaqeli (
talk)
21:15, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
@ Jaqeli: The info about streets, buildings, and other namesakes needs an introductory sentence. Right now it starts of with "For instance...", but fails to explain what the examples are instances of.
Once this is addressed, the only thing preventing this article from going forward is the issue of your topic ban and whether it applies here.-- ¿3fam ily6 contribs 21:28, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
@
3family6: Done Again, it's been more than 4 months now my TBAN is in action and I know where I should edit and where not so relax. This article is not under that ban.
Jaqeli (
talk)
21:33, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Everything looks in order now, so if @ Sandstein: confirms that this article is outside the scope of your ban, I will happily promote it to Good Article.-- ¿3fam ily6 contribs 21:38, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: 3family6 ( talk · contribs) 18:53, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
In the "Reign" section:
The "Legacy" section":
The referencing is good, but I think the second paragraph in "Life" could use a few more citations.
Significant writing issues throughout the article. If those are fixed, this article should be able to go forward to good article status.-- ¿3fam ily6 contribs 18:53, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
@
3family6: Done.
Jaqeli (
talk)
19:29, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
@ Jaqeli: The "Legacy" section still needs a rewrite. Also, after doing this review, I noticed that you are under a topic ban. I don't know whether this article falls within the scope of the ban or not. I requested comment from User:EdJohnston.-- ¿3fam ily6 contribs 20:37, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
@ 3family6: No it does not. This article is not under the TBAN so relax. What exactly is the problem of legacy section? Jaqeli ( talk) 20:40, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
@ Jaqeli: Forgive me for not taking your word for it, but I will wait for comment as to whether or not this falls under the ban. As for the "Legacy" section:
@
3family6: Done
Jaqeli (
talk)
21:15, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
@ Jaqeli: The info about streets, buildings, and other namesakes needs an introductory sentence. Right now it starts of with "For instance...", but fails to explain what the examples are instances of.
Once this is addressed, the only thing preventing this article from going forward is the issue of your topic ban and whether it applies here.-- ¿3fam ily6 contribs 21:28, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
@
3family6: Done Again, it's been more than 4 months now my TBAN is in action and I know where I should edit and where not so relax. This article is not under that ban.
Jaqeli (
talk)
21:33, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Everything looks in order now, so if @ Sandstein: confirms that this article is outside the scope of your ban, I will happily promote it to Good Article.-- ¿3fam ily6 contribs 21:38, 13 June 2014 (UTC)