This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Pharmaceutical industry in India article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a template-based chart or charts be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Useful templates may be found in
Category:Chart, diagram and graph formatting and function templates. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the
Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from Counterfeit medications was copied or moved into Pharmaceutical industry in India. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
In my opinion, the author of this page has forgotten to mention Cipla as an Indian Pharmaceutical Company. According to scrips 100, Cipla ranks 60, above Lupin and Dr. Reddy's which are ranked 66 and 72 respectively. Scrip100.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nihar 25292 ( talk • contribs) 14:58, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
I am not aware as what to do in this case. The following link (which has reference number two at the time) is broken. Thanks. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 10:54, 23 October 2013 (UTC) The link - http://www.cci.in/pdf/surveys_reports/indian-pharmaceuticals-industry.pdf
The link: http://www.pwc.in/press-releases/its-india-calling-for-global-pharmaceutical-companies.jhtml -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 11:00, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
I think that the article has been written by personal opinions of some people. Much of the material has no reference given. It is very painful to read one sided opinions of some people. The article does not seen neutral at all. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 11:44, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
"However, economic liberalisation in 90s by the former Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao and the then Finance Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh enabled the industry to become what it is today." - there is no evidence for this, I am removing the line. The growth in 90s were driven by external factors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.41.115 ( talk) 05:15, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
http://chemicals.nic.in/npp_circulation_latest.pdf This is the link where relevant document can be found. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 09:03, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
http://www.ibef.org/industry/pharmaceutical-india.aspx -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 07:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Pharmaceutical industry in India/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
== Comments by Mspraveen ( talk · contribs · count) == Consider using citation templates to appear more in the lines of manual of style. Otherwise, the article seems to have comprehensiveness to be classed higher up on the assessment quality scale. Once this is addressed, consider seeking a re-assessment at assessment department. Mspraveen ( talk) 12:17, 3 September 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 01:45, 1 January 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 02:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Pharmaceutical industry in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from:
https://invest.telangana.gov.in/pharma/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see
"using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or
"donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 11:13, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
When I initially came across this page, the "criticism" subsection was very subjective. Therefore I added a tag disputing the neutrality of the page. Now that I have deleted the opinionated statements and added more factual evidence with citations, I propose that we can remove this tag. Any thoughts? Coffeeking123 ( talk) 01:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Pharmaceutical industry in India article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a template-based chart or charts be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Useful templates may be found in
Category:Chart, diagram and graph formatting and function templates. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the
Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from Counterfeit medications was copied or moved into Pharmaceutical industry in India. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
In my opinion, the author of this page has forgotten to mention Cipla as an Indian Pharmaceutical Company. According to scrips 100, Cipla ranks 60, above Lupin and Dr. Reddy's which are ranked 66 and 72 respectively. Scrip100.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nihar 25292 ( talk • contribs) 14:58, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
I am not aware as what to do in this case. The following link (which has reference number two at the time) is broken. Thanks. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 10:54, 23 October 2013 (UTC) The link - http://www.cci.in/pdf/surveys_reports/indian-pharmaceuticals-industry.pdf
The link: http://www.pwc.in/press-releases/its-india-calling-for-global-pharmaceutical-companies.jhtml -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 11:00, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
I think that the article has been written by personal opinions of some people. Much of the material has no reference given. It is very painful to read one sided opinions of some people. The article does not seen neutral at all. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 11:44, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
"However, economic liberalisation in 90s by the former Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao and the then Finance Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh enabled the industry to become what it is today." - there is no evidence for this, I am removing the line. The growth in 90s were driven by external factors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.41.115 ( talk) 05:15, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
http://chemicals.nic.in/npp_circulation_latest.pdf This is the link where relevant document can be found. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 09:03, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
http://www.ibef.org/industry/pharmaceutical-india.aspx -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 07:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Pharmaceutical industry in India/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
== Comments by Mspraveen ( talk · contribs · count) == Consider using citation templates to appear more in the lines of manual of style. Otherwise, the article seems to have comprehensiveness to be classed higher up on the assessment quality scale. Once this is addressed, consider seeking a re-assessment at assessment department. Mspraveen ( talk) 12:17, 3 September 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 01:45, 1 January 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 02:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Pharmaceutical industry in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from:
https://invest.telangana.gov.in/pharma/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see
"using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or
"donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 11:13, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
When I initially came across this page, the "criticism" subsection was very subjective. Therefore I added a tag disputing the neutrality of the page. Now that I have deleted the opinionated statements and added more factual evidence with citations, I propose that we can remove this tag. Any thoughts? Coffeeking123 ( talk) 01:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)