Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khazar2 ( talk · contribs) 18:40, 20 July 2013 (UTC) reply

I'll be glad to take this review. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-5 days. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 18:40, 20 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Okay, only a few initial quibbles; this looks essentially ready to promote. Images check out, spotchecks show no copyright problems, article is neutral, sources appear reliable. Thanks for contributing another solid article.

Only one action point that I need you to look at:

• "It contains dozens of "fanciful" and "intricately detailed"" -- what source are these two quotations from? I didn't immediately find them in #3 or #7. -- Khazar2 ( talk) 13:12, 22 July 2013 (UTC) reply
  • . Ooops. See the Via source (I just added an inline citation.) Thanks! -- Another Believer _{( Talk)} 15:28, 22 July 2013 (UTC) reply

That's a pass, then. Thanks for your contributions here in both prose and images! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 20:13, 22 July 2013 (UTC) reply