The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Modussiccandi ( talk · contribs) 14:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
I'll start reviewing this later today. Best,
Modussiccandi (
talk)
14:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
A good article is—
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | The prose is good throughout. I'll go through the article and see if there are any minor changes I'd make. One minor point: I would change the phrasing of concealing in voyage - it sounds rather unidiomatic. |
![]() |
(b) (MoS) | Generally fine, though I'd like to raise the following points: 1) in the lead, I would rephrase in what today is Belgium per MOS:RELTIME. 2) The "Early life" section could, perhaps, be subdivided into a pre- and post-US stage. (something like, "Early life" and "Education in Missouri"). |
![]() |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The subject is presented in a neutral fashion. His religious and educational background as well as his work as Missouri vice provincial are given due prominence. |
![]() |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The article has mainly been edited by one person and shows no signs of instability. |
![]() |
Result | Notes |
---|---|
![]() |
This is a very good article. I am happy to pass it once the small issues in section 1 are dealt with. |
@ Ergo Sum: I've finished my review. I have also done a bit of easy-to-resovle copyediting. All that's left are some minor issues which I wanted to leave to you. Let me know when their done and I'll give the article a pass. Modussiccandi ( talk) 21:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Modussiccandi ( talk · contribs) 14:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
I'll start reviewing this later today. Best,
Modussiccandi (
talk)
14:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
A good article is—
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | The prose is good throughout. I'll go through the article and see if there are any minor changes I'd make. One minor point: I would change the phrasing of concealing in voyage - it sounds rather unidiomatic. |
![]() |
(b) (MoS) | Generally fine, though I'd like to raise the following points: 1) in the lead, I would rephrase in what today is Belgium per MOS:RELTIME. 2) The "Early life" section could, perhaps, be subdivided into a pre- and post-US stage. (something like, "Early life" and "Education in Missouri"). |
![]() |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The subject is presented in a neutral fashion. His religious and educational background as well as his work as Missouri vice provincial are given due prominence. |
![]() |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The article has mainly been edited by one person and shows no signs of instability. |
![]() |
Result | Notes |
---|---|
![]() |
This is a very good article. I am happy to pass it once the small issues in section 1 are dealt with. |
@ Ergo Sum: I've finished my review. I have also done a bit of easy-to-resovle copyediting. All that's left are some minor issues which I wanted to leave to you. Let me know when their done and I'll give the article a pass. Modussiccandi ( talk) 21:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)