GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Night w ( talk • message • contribs • count • logs • email) 01:43, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Article looks good at the moment, if a little small... There are a couple of issues, but these shouldn't take too long to clear up. I will do a copyedit first, then check referencing, then place a detailed review here.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Thank you for taking the time and effort to review the article. I've gone through the maintenance tags; most things are referenced, and there seems to be only one thing that somehow has been missed. As for "a few", that is the wording in the source, so I cannot be more accurate than that. Thank you for the copyedit, which is most appreciated, but please to not change to British spelling. I write in American English, and to keep the text consistent it is necessary to give the {{ convert}} template an extra parameter, see WP:ENGVAR. As for the length of the article, there is nothing more worth mentioning. It is a nearly inaccessible island consisting of a glacier which near zero human activity. What is worth mentioning has been said. Arsenikk (talk) 13:59, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
|sp=us
syntax in the convert fields. I'm a little uncertain of when this was removed, by when I added the |sp=us
syntax prior to the nomination I was simply reverting back to the original variety of the language. So I retain my right to use American spelling in this article; please do not revert this again. Otherwise, again, thank you for the review.
Arsenikk
(talk)
21:15, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Night w ( talk • message • contribs • count • logs • email) 01:43, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Article looks good at the moment, if a little small... There are a couple of issues, but these shouldn't take too long to clear up. I will do a copyedit first, then check referencing, then place a detailed review here.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Thank you for taking the time and effort to review the article. I've gone through the maintenance tags; most things are referenced, and there seems to be only one thing that somehow has been missed. As for "a few", that is the wording in the source, so I cannot be more accurate than that. Thank you for the copyedit, which is most appreciated, but please to not change to British spelling. I write in American English, and to keep the text consistent it is necessary to give the {{ convert}} template an extra parameter, see WP:ENGVAR. As for the length of the article, there is nothing more worth mentioning. It is a nearly inaccessible island consisting of a glacier which near zero human activity. What is worth mentioning has been said. Arsenikk (talk) 13:59, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
|sp=us
syntax in the convert fields. I'm a little uncertain of when this was removed, by when I added the |sp=us
syntax prior to the nomination I was simply reverting back to the original variety of the language. So I retain my right to use American spelling in this article; please do not revert this again. Otherwise, again, thank you for the review.
Arsenikk
(talk)
21:15, 8 September 2011 (UTC)