This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Peter Daszak article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
Index,
1Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
based in part on Shi [Zhengli]'s emailed answers." ( RfC, December 2021)
This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
List of good sources with good coverage to help expand. Not necessarily for inclusion but just for consideration. Preferably not articles that just discuss a single quote/press conference. The long-style reporting would be even better. Feel free to edit directly to add to the list. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 17:39, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Last updated by Julian Brown ( talk) 23:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
] · |
---|
For the relevant sourcing guideline, see WP:SCHOLARSHIP. For a database curated by the NCBI, see LitCoVID |
|
] · |
---|
For the relevant sourcing guideline, see WP:RSOPINION. |
|
] · |
---|
Keep in mind, these are primary sources and thus should be used with caution! |
|
References
Right now the section has three years intertwined, making it hard to read. If someone could go date by date, instead of prose paragraphs, that would be great.~~~~ Tallard ( talk) 01:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
The most effectual Bob Cat, though I'm happy to talk through the content issues on including that snippet of the ODNI report in the lead, can we start with a procedural issue? Your re-revert violate the active arbitration enforcement sanction. Per the edit notice and this page's header: "Changes challenged by reversion may not be reinstated without affirmative consensus on the talk page." Please self-revert. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 03:33, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Incorrect spelling of "he" as "hi" in this portion of the article. "In May 2024, the United States Department of Health and Human Services banned all federal funding for Daszak, saying that hi did not properly monitor research activities" 2601:989:8200:F980:95DC:2606:B653:E3F3 ( talk) 13:34, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Regarding the sentence that starts, "It is stated that "Dr. Daszak, Dr. Fauci, and other health leaders have repeatedly played semantics with..."
The context makes it appear that's from the DHHS report, when in fact it's from the House Oversight Committee. One can't detect the change in source without checking the footnotes. Perhaps the sentence can begin as: "According to the House Oversight Committee...". Thank You. -Anonymous -- 64.52.139.54 ( talk) 06:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Peter Daszak article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
Index,
1Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
based in part on Shi [Zhengli]'s emailed answers." ( RfC, December 2021)
This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
List of good sources with good coverage to help expand. Not necessarily for inclusion but just for consideration. Preferably not articles that just discuss a single quote/press conference. The long-style reporting would be even better. Feel free to edit directly to add to the list. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 17:39, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Last updated by Julian Brown ( talk) 23:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
] · |
---|
For the relevant sourcing guideline, see WP:SCHOLARSHIP. For a database curated by the NCBI, see LitCoVID |
|
] · |
---|
For the relevant sourcing guideline, see WP:RSOPINION. |
|
] · |
---|
Keep in mind, these are primary sources and thus should be used with caution! |
|
References
Right now the section has three years intertwined, making it hard to read. If someone could go date by date, instead of prose paragraphs, that would be great.~~~~ Tallard ( talk) 01:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
The most effectual Bob Cat, though I'm happy to talk through the content issues on including that snippet of the ODNI report in the lead, can we start with a procedural issue? Your re-revert violate the active arbitration enforcement sanction. Per the edit notice and this page's header: "Changes challenged by reversion may not be reinstated without affirmative consensus on the talk page." Please self-revert. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 03:33, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Incorrect spelling of "he" as "hi" in this portion of the article. "In May 2024, the United States Department of Health and Human Services banned all federal funding for Daszak, saying that hi did not properly monitor research activities" 2601:989:8200:F980:95DC:2606:B653:E3F3 ( talk) 13:34, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Regarding the sentence that starts, "It is stated that "Dr. Daszak, Dr. Fauci, and other health leaders have repeatedly played semantics with..."
The context makes it appear that's from the DHHS report, when in fact it's from the House Oversight Committee. One can't detect the change in source without checking the footnotes. Perhaps the sentence can begin as: "According to the House Oversight Committee...". Thank You. -Anonymous -- 64.52.139.54 ( talk) 06:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)