The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 2023-05-18. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
A note to any admin or experienced editor who may review this Draft. The initial author of the draft is a single-purpose account who appears to be focused on an agenda to criticize a global scientific initiative. In this early draft, sources are already being used to support claims that are not mentioned in the sources. For example, footnote 4 cites a document that makes no mention of "starting his own strategic consulting firm". In my estimation, this is the work of someone with a dull axe to grind. - AppleBsTime ( talk) 04:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
In this diff on April 1st, @ Onel5969 added a {{notability}} tag during Page patrol.
I would like to document on the talk page why I think the page satisfies notability criteria.
According to WP:BASIC it is sufficient to show:
Bogner, and his role in founding GISAID is covered in significant detail in multiple reliable, intellectually independent secondary sources. In particular the first devotes many paragraphs to Bogner. Both sources are of high reputation and reliability ( Wallstreet Journal and Science):
There is continued coverage of Bogner's role as President of GISAID, more than 10 years after the initial foundation event in 2006.
The following recent articles all mention Bogner:
Bogner is quoted in these reliable sources (just a selection):
Lastly, Bogner is President of an organization that receives significant high profile media coverage. This should additionally be considered for the determination of notability:
AncientWalrus ( talk) 16:58, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
With the recent very extensive Science news piece almost exlusively about Peter Bogner, there should no longer be any doubt about his notability. There has been significant coverage in reliable sources (Wall Street Journal, Science) over two decades. AncientWalrus ( talk) 21:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
@
Smartse removed the sentence He has been a frequent participant at the
World Economic Forum.
in this recent
due to can't find any refs to support "He has been a frequent participant at the World Economic Forum.")
which is fine, but I remember reading about this in reliable sources. I will go and try to find it and post my results here.
AncientWalrus (
talk)
15:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Bogner's role is a bit of an enigma even to those who have worked closely with him. [...] Well-connected and a frequent participant at the annual celebrity-studded World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Bogner says he used his “talent to make people talk to each other” to broker the letter.
— https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.313.5790.1026
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/gisaid-peter-bogner-covid-pandemic-database/ SmartSE ( talk) 11:08, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 2023-05-18. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
A note to any admin or experienced editor who may review this Draft. The initial author of the draft is a single-purpose account who appears to be focused on an agenda to criticize a global scientific initiative. In this early draft, sources are already being used to support claims that are not mentioned in the sources. For example, footnote 4 cites a document that makes no mention of "starting his own strategic consulting firm". In my estimation, this is the work of someone with a dull axe to grind. - AppleBsTime ( talk) 04:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
In this diff on April 1st, @ Onel5969 added a {{notability}} tag during Page patrol.
I would like to document on the talk page why I think the page satisfies notability criteria.
According to WP:BASIC it is sufficient to show:
Bogner, and his role in founding GISAID is covered in significant detail in multiple reliable, intellectually independent secondary sources. In particular the first devotes many paragraphs to Bogner. Both sources are of high reputation and reliability ( Wallstreet Journal and Science):
There is continued coverage of Bogner's role as President of GISAID, more than 10 years after the initial foundation event in 2006.
The following recent articles all mention Bogner:
Bogner is quoted in these reliable sources (just a selection):
Lastly, Bogner is President of an organization that receives significant high profile media coverage. This should additionally be considered for the determination of notability:
AncientWalrus ( talk) 16:58, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
With the recent very extensive Science news piece almost exlusively about Peter Bogner, there should no longer be any doubt about his notability. There has been significant coverage in reliable sources (Wall Street Journal, Science) over two decades. AncientWalrus ( talk) 21:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
@
Smartse removed the sentence He has been a frequent participant at the
World Economic Forum.
in this recent
due to can't find any refs to support "He has been a frequent participant at the World Economic Forum.")
which is fine, but I remember reading about this in reliable sources. I will go and try to find it and post my results here.
AncientWalrus (
talk)
15:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Bogner's role is a bit of an enigma even to those who have worked closely with him. [...] Well-connected and a frequent participant at the annual celebrity-studded World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Bogner says he used his “talent to make people talk to each other” to broker the letter.
— https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.313.5790.1026
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/gisaid-peter-bogner-covid-pandemic-database/ SmartSE ( talk) 11:08, 18 June 2023 (UTC)