![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The article about Anthony Pratkanis professor of persuasion has been started, he is the author of The book Age of propaganda: The everyday use and abuse of persuasion. Anthony pratkanis and elliot aronson (editors). SriMesh | talk 02:40, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
This section appears to be wishful thinking and doesn't seem to meet Wikipedia standards on the basis of substantiation and/or original thinking. One would have to clarify what exactly are "Systems of persuasion", what is the basis for defining them as such, and where is the evidence that they actually lead to persuasion. I marked this section dubious and added a note. I'll delete it unless such explanation is provided. TippTopp ( talk) 01:31, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
I have changed the definition of persuasion in accordance with two thinkers on the subject, who uphold an "expanded" meaning of the term. It appears to encompass the majority of definitions by published sources. The definition in this article has been simplified to:
"Persuasion is the influence of beliefs, attitudes, intentions, motivations, or behaviors,"
from
"Persuasion involves one or more persons who are engaged in the activity of creating, reinforcing, modifying, or extinguishing beliefs, attitudes, intentions, motivations, and/or behaviors within the constraints of a given communication context."
Since the subject constitutes a fuzzy concept, feel free to change this and future definitions. Moreover, I believe a distinction between persuasion and rhetoric could be useful. NTox ( talk) 06:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
The article states there is a persuasive advantage to talking in the left ear. Every reference I have found online states that the advantage is for the right ear. Can someone verify which is correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.177.106.108 ( talk) 04:59, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
I think the article would benefit from elaboration on persuasion before it jumps into "Methods." How about a history section, a section on notable examples of mass persuasion or persuasion in experimental settings, etc.... Have a look at the rhetoric page, which seems to be much more fleshed out. I also take issue with the Methods section taking information from just two books. Are these the preeminent works in the field? Finally, the neurobiology section doesn't have much background. Requiredforclass ( talk) 20:00, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Friestad, Marian; Wright, Peter. Everyday persuasion knowledge. Psychology & Marketing16. 2 (Mar 1999): 185.
Lyttle, Jim. The effectiveness of humor in persuasion: The case of business ethics training. The Journal of General Psychology128. 2 (Apr 2001): 206-16.
Yoo, Chan Yun. THE EFFECTS OF PERSUASION KNOWLEDGE ON CLICK-THROUGH OF KEYWORD SEARCH ADS: MODERATING ROLE OF SEARCH TASK AND PERCEIVED FAIRNESS. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly86. 2 (Summer 2009): 401-418.
Murphy, P Karen; Alexander, Patricia A. Persuasion As a Dynamic, Multidimensional Process: An Investigation of Individual and Intraindividual Differences. American Educational Research Journal41. 2(Summer 2004): 337-363.
Sinclair, Robert C.; Mark, Melvin M.; Clore, Gerald L.Mood-Related Persuasion Depends on (Mis)Attributions. Social Cognition12. 4 (Dec 1994): 309-326.
Watkins, M. (2001). Principles of persuasion. Negotiation Journal, 17(2), 115-137. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/205148964?accountid=12935
Leding, Juliana K.False memories and persuasion strategies. Review of General Psychology16. 3 (Sep 2012): 256-268.
mmm.designs ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:09, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Taking the comments into consideration, I decided to focus on one article to improve to improve/add things (1) introduction to Persuasion so we do not have to jump straight to methods and (2) Culture Specific Everday Persuasion. I am going to be using this article: Friestad, Marian; Wright, Peter. Everyday persuasion knowledge. Psychology & Marketing16. 2 (Mar 1999): 185. This is an aced mix per-reviewed article that has been cited 43 times.
Outline of Talking Points or Subsections within part 2
1. Sociocognitive resources and sociocultural
2. Persuasion tactics and culture
3. Researchers andDiffusion into culture
4. Persuasion Expertise — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.69.132.56 ( talk) 06:27, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The article about Anthony Pratkanis professor of persuasion has been started, he is the author of The book Age of propaganda: The everyday use and abuse of persuasion. Anthony pratkanis and elliot aronson (editors). SriMesh | talk 02:40, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
This section appears to be wishful thinking and doesn't seem to meet Wikipedia standards on the basis of substantiation and/or original thinking. One would have to clarify what exactly are "Systems of persuasion", what is the basis for defining them as such, and where is the evidence that they actually lead to persuasion. I marked this section dubious and added a note. I'll delete it unless such explanation is provided. TippTopp ( talk) 01:31, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
I have changed the definition of persuasion in accordance with two thinkers on the subject, who uphold an "expanded" meaning of the term. It appears to encompass the majority of definitions by published sources. The definition in this article has been simplified to:
"Persuasion is the influence of beliefs, attitudes, intentions, motivations, or behaviors,"
from
"Persuasion involves one or more persons who are engaged in the activity of creating, reinforcing, modifying, or extinguishing beliefs, attitudes, intentions, motivations, and/or behaviors within the constraints of a given communication context."
Since the subject constitutes a fuzzy concept, feel free to change this and future definitions. Moreover, I believe a distinction between persuasion and rhetoric could be useful. NTox ( talk) 06:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
The article states there is a persuasive advantage to talking in the left ear. Every reference I have found online states that the advantage is for the right ear. Can someone verify which is correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.177.106.108 ( talk) 04:59, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
I think the article would benefit from elaboration on persuasion before it jumps into "Methods." How about a history section, a section on notable examples of mass persuasion or persuasion in experimental settings, etc.... Have a look at the rhetoric page, which seems to be much more fleshed out. I also take issue with the Methods section taking information from just two books. Are these the preeminent works in the field? Finally, the neurobiology section doesn't have much background. Requiredforclass ( talk) 20:00, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Friestad, Marian; Wright, Peter. Everyday persuasion knowledge. Psychology & Marketing16. 2 (Mar 1999): 185.
Lyttle, Jim. The effectiveness of humor in persuasion: The case of business ethics training. The Journal of General Psychology128. 2 (Apr 2001): 206-16.
Yoo, Chan Yun. THE EFFECTS OF PERSUASION KNOWLEDGE ON CLICK-THROUGH OF KEYWORD SEARCH ADS: MODERATING ROLE OF SEARCH TASK AND PERCEIVED FAIRNESS. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly86. 2 (Summer 2009): 401-418.
Murphy, P Karen; Alexander, Patricia A. Persuasion As a Dynamic, Multidimensional Process: An Investigation of Individual and Intraindividual Differences. American Educational Research Journal41. 2(Summer 2004): 337-363.
Sinclair, Robert C.; Mark, Melvin M.; Clore, Gerald L.Mood-Related Persuasion Depends on (Mis)Attributions. Social Cognition12. 4 (Dec 1994): 309-326.
Watkins, M. (2001). Principles of persuasion. Negotiation Journal, 17(2), 115-137. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/205148964?accountid=12935
Leding, Juliana K.False memories and persuasion strategies. Review of General Psychology16. 3 (Sep 2012): 256-268.
mmm.designs ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:09, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Taking the comments into consideration, I decided to focus on one article to improve to improve/add things (1) introduction to Persuasion so we do not have to jump straight to methods and (2) Culture Specific Everday Persuasion. I am going to be using this article: Friestad, Marian; Wright, Peter. Everyday persuasion knowledge. Psychology & Marketing16. 2 (Mar 1999): 185. This is an aced mix per-reviewed article that has been cited 43 times.
Outline of Talking Points or Subsections within part 2
1. Sociocognitive resources and sociocultural
2. Persuasion tactics and culture
3. Researchers andDiffusion into culture
4. Persuasion Expertise — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.69.132.56 ( talk) 06:27, 24 October 2012 (UTC)