This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Persistent genital arousal disorder article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 8 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Epaniagua2000. Peer reviewers: KMCC448, YamilBar, Srehman07.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 06:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
There is no consensus that PGAD actually exists. This seems to be an attempt to apply a label to a fictional condition as a precursor to "sell" a cure.
I move to have this article scrapped & removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.241.245 ( talk) 14:45, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
This is reported in some males but the article makes it appear as an only female disease. Andrew Z. Colvin • Talk 06:38, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
The Classification and History sections convey the same type of information. Both sections deal with the naming of the disorder, and various conceptualizations or valuations of it. There is information in the latter section: "In 2006, Leiblum renamed the condition to "persistent genital arousal disorder" to indicate that genital arousal sensations are different from those that result from true sexual arousal." - that essentially answers a subjective issue being raised in the earlier section. This subjective statement, and its partner: "The condition has been characterized by a researcher as being a term with no scientific basis.[7] There is concern that the title may be misleading because, since the genital arousal is unwanted, it is dubious to characterize it as arousal.[7]" - have a fake reference; the cited source does not even mention PGAD. Propose to merge the Classification and History sections and remove falsely sourced statements. Livin270 ( talk) 01:30, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Male PGAD: A Case Study of the Rare and Debilitating Persistent Genital Arousal Disorder, by William M. Love ISBN:978-1-716-38420-2 —¿philoserf? ( talk) 03:03, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Persistent genital arousal disorder article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 8 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Epaniagua2000. Peer reviewers: KMCC448, YamilBar, Srehman07.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 06:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
There is no consensus that PGAD actually exists. This seems to be an attempt to apply a label to a fictional condition as a precursor to "sell" a cure.
I move to have this article scrapped & removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.241.245 ( talk) 14:45, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
This is reported in some males but the article makes it appear as an only female disease. Andrew Z. Colvin • Talk 06:38, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
The Classification and History sections convey the same type of information. Both sections deal with the naming of the disorder, and various conceptualizations or valuations of it. There is information in the latter section: "In 2006, Leiblum renamed the condition to "persistent genital arousal disorder" to indicate that genital arousal sensations are different from those that result from true sexual arousal." - that essentially answers a subjective issue being raised in the earlier section. This subjective statement, and its partner: "The condition has been characterized by a researcher as being a term with no scientific basis.[7] There is concern that the title may be misleading because, since the genital arousal is unwanted, it is dubious to characterize it as arousal.[7]" - have a fake reference; the cited source does not even mention PGAD. Propose to merge the Classification and History sections and remove falsely sourced statements. Livin270 ( talk) 01:30, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Male PGAD: A Case Study of the Rare and Debilitating Persistent Genital Arousal Disorder, by William M. Love ISBN:978-1-716-38420-2 —¿philoserf? ( talk) 03:03, 13 November 2021 (UTC)