![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This page should not be speedily deleted because... It is not really needed as a separate article and can alternatively be mentioned on the article of the type of worm. -- ChrisStyles ( talk) 00:00, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because... patent nonsense or gibberish, really? With two academic references? I can see an AFD argument for WP:NOTDICT (give me a few days) but not a CSD G1.
Zad
68
00:11, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This page should not be speedily deleted because... It is not really needed as a separate article and can alternatively be mentioned on the article of the type of worm. -- ChrisStyles ( talk) 00:00, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because... patent nonsense or gibberish, really? With two academic references? I can see an AFD argument for WP:NOTDICT (give me a few days) but not a CSD G1.
Zad
68
00:11, 14 May 2012 (UTC)