Period 1 element has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
Period 1 element is the main article in the Period 1 elements series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Group 3 element which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 21:15, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
This discussion was listed at Wikipedia:Move review on 18 March 2014. The result of the move review was Withdrawn by nominator. |
The result of the move request was: not moved. This proposal was a procedural disaster, because instead of listing a properly-formatted RM per Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting_multiple_page_moves, the nominator split the discussion over two separate pages. The proposal was rejected on both pages, so the outcome is clear. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 15:56, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Period 1 element →
Period 1 – See
WT:ELEMENTS#Rename pages 'Period X element' into 'Period X' for central discussion. When that discussion shows consensus, a formal request will be made for the 9 pages.
DePiep (
talk) 10:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Sort of funny: the current name fails on all five. First of all the name actually used in the scientific domain is period 1 undisputed even (do your have sources saying otherwise?). Then on the Big Five of Recognizability, Naturalness, Precision, Conciseness, Consistency that name scores higher than the circumventive "(period 1 is) period 1 element(s)" -- which is even not true. As for difference with other page names, we apply 1. WP:DAB with 2. the existing fact of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC (if not primary topic, DAB requires to name it "period 1 (periodic table)", so). Changing the name, into a wrong one at that, is never acceptable or asked. You are not free to choose a nicer name when the name exists. And remember: "Team A member(s)" is not the same as "Team A". - DePiep ( talk) 13:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
This section/sentence is a bit wrong headed. Periodic trends are those which repeat from period to period (e.g. noble gas behavior recurring). What this really means to talk about is "horizontal trends" across the period. What the article means to say, I guess, is that horizontal trends are due to a quantum shell filling, and since 1s fills within 2 electrons, there's not much scope to look at 'trends'. It's also perhaps worth noting that when Mendelev put the "periodic" table together, he didn't know the noble gases existed, so all he had to place from what would become period 1 was hydrogen.-- feline1 ( talk) 11:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Period 1 element has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
Period 1 element is the main article in the Period 1 elements series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Group 3 element which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 21:15, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
This discussion was listed at Wikipedia:Move review on 18 March 2014. The result of the move review was Withdrawn by nominator. |
The result of the move request was: not moved. This proposal was a procedural disaster, because instead of listing a properly-formatted RM per Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting_multiple_page_moves, the nominator split the discussion over two separate pages. The proposal was rejected on both pages, so the outcome is clear. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 15:56, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Period 1 element →
Period 1 – See
WT:ELEMENTS#Rename pages 'Period X element' into 'Period X' for central discussion. When that discussion shows consensus, a formal request will be made for the 9 pages.
DePiep (
talk) 10:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Sort of funny: the current name fails on all five. First of all the name actually used in the scientific domain is period 1 undisputed even (do your have sources saying otherwise?). Then on the Big Five of Recognizability, Naturalness, Precision, Conciseness, Consistency that name scores higher than the circumventive "(period 1 is) period 1 element(s)" -- which is even not true. As for difference with other page names, we apply 1. WP:DAB with 2. the existing fact of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC (if not primary topic, DAB requires to name it "period 1 (periodic table)", so). Changing the name, into a wrong one at that, is never acceptable or asked. You are not free to choose a nicer name when the name exists. And remember: "Team A member(s)" is not the same as "Team A". - DePiep ( talk) 13:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
This section/sentence is a bit wrong headed. Periodic trends are those which repeat from period to period (e.g. noble gas behavior recurring). What this really means to talk about is "horizontal trends" across the period. What the article means to say, I guess, is that horizontal trends are due to a quantum shell filling, and since 1s fills within 2 electrons, there's not much scope to look at 'trends'. It's also perhaps worth noting that when Mendelev put the "periodic" table together, he didn't know the noble gases existed, so all he had to place from what would become period 1 was hydrogen.-- feline1 ( talk) 11:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)