This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Perinçek v. Switzerland article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The second sentence in the Judgment section states: 'The Court also declared it is not possible to legally characterise the 1915 events as genocide.' There is no such statement in any of the quotations from the judgment. Unless such a statement is found in the judgment and directly quoted, that sentence needs to be removed. Diranakir ( talk) 05:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Why are these given such a due weight to be rather fully noted in this WP article? I'd encourage a discussion/explanation or a change. 78.55.124.180 ( talk) 23:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
I boldly deleted the quote from Harut Sassounian stating Perinçek was serving a life sentence, because of BLP issues. Perinçek was released because of a mistrial. He will be retried, and as it is he is neither found guilty nor serving a life sentence.[ [1]](edit: the link is in Turkish, sorry about that) The other negative reaction was just some name calling at its best. Though I don't know what encyclopedic value that comment gives to the article, I did not delete it, though if anyone does, I would not object. Darwinian Ape talk 07:59, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
The verdict says "He is a doctor of laws and chairman of the Turkish Workers’ Party." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.121.116.7 ( talk) 13:47, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Perinçek v. Switzerland article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The second sentence in the Judgment section states: 'The Court also declared it is not possible to legally characterise the 1915 events as genocide.' There is no such statement in any of the quotations from the judgment. Unless such a statement is found in the judgment and directly quoted, that sentence needs to be removed. Diranakir ( talk) 05:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Why are these given such a due weight to be rather fully noted in this WP article? I'd encourage a discussion/explanation or a change. 78.55.124.180 ( talk) 23:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
I boldly deleted the quote from Harut Sassounian stating Perinçek was serving a life sentence, because of BLP issues. Perinçek was released because of a mistrial. He will be retried, and as it is he is neither found guilty nor serving a life sentence.[ [1]](edit: the link is in Turkish, sorry about that) The other negative reaction was just some name calling at its best. Though I don't know what encyclopedic value that comment gives to the article, I did not delete it, though if anyone does, I would not object. Darwinian Ape talk 07:59, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
The verdict says "He is a doctor of laws and chairman of the Turkish Workers’ Party." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.121.116.7 ( talk) 13:47, 4 April 2017 (UTC)