 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
sorry for being subjective - I just have not found yet material from sources I am not linked to which of course would be welcome! Herdtien ( talk) 16:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was Moved to Perpetual robotics. Lynch 7 17:54, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Perceptual Robotics → Perceptual robotics –
Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term. Another article creator simply though we use title case. It's just a field of study. Tony (talk) 06:57, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Not a proper noun and should be decapitalised accordingly. Jenks24 ( talk) 10:42, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
|
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
sorry for being subjective - I just have not found yet material from sources I am not linked to which of course would be welcome! Herdtien ( talk) 16:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was Moved to Perpetual robotics. Lynch 7 17:54, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Perceptual Robotics → Perceptual robotics –
Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term. Another article creator simply though we use title case. It's just a field of study. Tony (talk) 06:57, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Not a proper noun and should be decapitalised accordingly. Jenks24 ( talk) 10:42, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.