From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How common is that mistake?

"Penuel" and "pineal" are of course unrelated linguistically; not that that ever stopped religious apologists. But how popular is this mistake? And has anyone notable argued against it?

198.228.228.146 ( talk) 13:53, 8 October 2013 (UTC) Collin237 reply


It's obvious WP:UNDUE rot of the kind forwarded under the auspices of " Ivan van Sertima (editor)", apparently under the assumption that nobody can stop you from publishing absolute drivel as long as you keep playing the race card. [1] Wikipedia has seen its fair share of this madness. -- dab (𒁳) 10:26, 9 December 2013 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How common is that mistake?

"Penuel" and "pineal" are of course unrelated linguistically; not that that ever stopped religious apologists. But how popular is this mistake? And has anyone notable argued against it?

198.228.228.146 ( talk) 13:53, 8 October 2013 (UTC) Collin237 reply


It's obvious WP:UNDUE rot of the kind forwarded under the auspices of " Ivan van Sertima (editor)", apparently under the assumption that nobody can stop you from publishing absolute drivel as long as you keep playing the race card. [1] Wikipedia has seen its fair share of this madness. -- dab (𒁳) 10:26, 9 December 2013 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook