![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article may need to be merged with Perineum. -- Una Smith ( talk) 18:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
I don't really know, but I guess it's so. In many other mammals, even in chimps, the pelvis has a different shape and it lacks a "floor-like" shape, as the posture isn't upright; it's somewhat like a pelvic "canopy". Many anatomy articles are somewhat "anthropocentric", they go describing the anatomy as such but sometimes fail to mention whether the specific human trait is being described or whether it's a broader description that applies to most of the organisms that have the organ. This article probably does not states that the term does not apply to non-human or non-upright primates, but has an illustration that makes clearer what I said about how it's likely to be a term more specific to primary (i.e. not-secondary, not "primitive", but "advanced") bipedal hominine anatomy. -- Extremophile ( talk) 04:44, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
This article suffers from total absence of readability, and is CLEARLY meant only for medical students. It's probably someone's rewording of a medical textbook. Could somebody improve this to the point that the rest of humanity can also understand this? Thanks In Advance. Crusty007 ( talk) 00:47, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
This article is lacking any information for men. Aperseghin ( talk) 13:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
No need for a separate article. Article relates to structures in, around and supporting associated with pelvic floor. Content better placed in pelvic floor article. Tom (LT) ( talk) 09:44, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article may need to be merged with Perineum. -- Una Smith ( talk) 18:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
I don't really know, but I guess it's so. In many other mammals, even in chimps, the pelvis has a different shape and it lacks a "floor-like" shape, as the posture isn't upright; it's somewhat like a pelvic "canopy". Many anatomy articles are somewhat "anthropocentric", they go describing the anatomy as such but sometimes fail to mention whether the specific human trait is being described or whether it's a broader description that applies to most of the organisms that have the organ. This article probably does not states that the term does not apply to non-human or non-upright primates, but has an illustration that makes clearer what I said about how it's likely to be a term more specific to primary (i.e. not-secondary, not "primitive", but "advanced") bipedal hominine anatomy. -- Extremophile ( talk) 04:44, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
This article suffers from total absence of readability, and is CLEARLY meant only for medical students. It's probably someone's rewording of a medical textbook. Could somebody improve this to the point that the rest of humanity can also understand this? Thanks In Advance. Crusty007 ( talk) 00:47, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
This article is lacking any information for men. Aperseghin ( talk) 13:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
No need for a separate article. Article relates to structures in, around and supporting associated with pelvic floor. Content better placed in pelvic floor article. Tom (LT) ( talk) 09:44, 23 March 2018 (UTC)