This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Arkansas Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Arkansas. Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Death Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

No press coverage indicated this was the most severe case of related murders in the state, despite five people having been killed in the burglaries. Suggests considerable violence in the state. Parkwells ( talk) 15:39, 10 August 2015 (UTC) reply

I removed this earlier and agree with the removal by another editor. Basically it's not significant enough to meet WP:UNDUE - if Stix's comments had been publicised, maybe then. Doug Weller ( talk) 16:28, 10 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Deleted category of "Controversies in 2009" because the article did not appear to support that. A new trial being ordered in an appeals case is not a substantial enough controversy to merit inclusion. Parkwells ( talk) 18:14, 10 August 2015 (UTC) reply