 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: procedural close; please continue centralized discussion at Talk:Architecture of Peja#Requested move 24 December 2014. Dekimasu よ! 18:22, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Peja Bath → Peć Bath – Consistency with main article, Peć. Also, that is COMMONNAME also anyway. Ąnαșταη ( ταlκ) 12:29, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support - Should have the same name as the parent article. IJA ( talk) 13:49, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose. Opening a "Requested move" discussion, and then immediately moving the article yourself, depopulating the relevant category, and moving the category reeks of desperate POV-pushing. Stop it. bobrayner ( talk) 13:52, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, that was exactly what you did with Category:Peć. If you dont remeber, look at category History. Also, you must explain why you oppose, as you didnt place any argument against it, but you only commented me. That's also bad. -- Ąnαșταη ( ταlκ) 14:19, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support for consistency per WP:AT. -- Local hero talk 16:11, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support - with same arguments as in the entries of the two previous supporting users, consistency with the main article being the most important one. Also, as stated in the other discussion about this, both Peć and Pejë/Peja are considered official, although Peć appears to be the one that's established itself in English, just like we say Kiev and Gothenburg instead of Kyiv and Göteborg. - Anonimski ( talk) 16:21, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Architecture of Peja which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 18:31, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/ c 13:48, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Peć Bath →
Pećka Banja – 0 results on google everywhere for Peć Bath, that is made up translated name what is never used. On the other side
258 for Pećka Banja on Google Books, most in English. Also, all other
Banja's are named like this, consistency with other articles. In both languages are called Banja, so move this to a proper place.
Axiomus (
talk)
10:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support common name. Not a "bath".-- Zoupan 18:38, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support. We need a name supported by sources. The proposed one is maybe not the best one but is certainly better than the current title which is not attested in any sources. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:13, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
- Bracelets hand-wrought silver.jpg ( discussion)
- Silver ring.jpg ( discussion)
- Typical military helmet or helmet Illyrian VI-V centuries BC, lateral view.jpg ( discussion)
- Work from amber beads.jpg ( discussion)
- Wrought silver ring.jpg ( discussion)
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:38, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
- Bracelets hand-wrought silver.jpg ( discussion)
- Silver ring.jpg ( discussion)
- Typical military helmet or helmet Illyrian VI-V centuries BC, lateral view.jpg ( discussion)
- Work from amber beads.jpg ( discussion)
- Wrought silver ring.jpg ( discussion)
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 22:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: procedural close; please continue centralized discussion at Talk:Architecture of Peja#Requested move 24 December 2014. Dekimasu よ! 18:22, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Peja Bath → Peć Bath – Consistency with main article, Peć. Also, that is COMMONNAME also anyway. Ąnαșταη ( ταlκ) 12:29, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support - Should have the same name as the parent article. IJA ( talk) 13:49, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose. Opening a "Requested move" discussion, and then immediately moving the article yourself, depopulating the relevant category, and moving the category reeks of desperate POV-pushing. Stop it. bobrayner ( talk) 13:52, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, that was exactly what you did with Category:Peć. If you dont remeber, look at category History. Also, you must explain why you oppose, as you didnt place any argument against it, but you only commented me. That's also bad. -- Ąnαșταη ( ταlκ) 14:19, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support for consistency per WP:AT. -- Local hero talk 16:11, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support - with same arguments as in the entries of the two previous supporting users, consistency with the main article being the most important one. Also, as stated in the other discussion about this, both Peć and Pejë/Peja are considered official, although Peć appears to be the one that's established itself in English, just like we say Kiev and Gothenburg instead of Kyiv and Göteborg. - Anonimski ( talk) 16:21, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Architecture of Peja which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 18:31, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/ c 13:48, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Peć Bath →
Pećka Banja – 0 results on google everywhere for Peć Bath, that is made up translated name what is never used. On the other side
258 for Pećka Banja on Google Books, most in English. Also, all other
Banja's are named like this, consistency with other articles. In both languages are called Banja, so move this to a proper place.
Axiomus (
talk)
10:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support common name. Not a "bath".-- Zoupan 18:38, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support. We need a name supported by sources. The proposed one is maybe not the best one but is certainly better than the current title which is not attested in any sources. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:13, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
- Bracelets hand-wrought silver.jpg ( discussion)
- Silver ring.jpg ( discussion)
- Typical military helmet or helmet Illyrian VI-V centuries BC, lateral view.jpg ( discussion)
- Work from amber beads.jpg ( discussion)
- Wrought silver ring.jpg ( discussion)
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:38, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
- Bracelets hand-wrought silver.jpg ( discussion)
- Silver ring.jpg ( discussion)
- Typical military helmet or helmet Illyrian VI-V centuries BC, lateral view.jpg ( discussion)
- Work from amber beads.jpg ( discussion)
- Wrought silver ring.jpg ( discussion)
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 22:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC)