![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 26 February 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This page was
proposed for deletion by
Resequent (
talk ·
contribs) on 14 February 2023 with the comment: Fails WP:GNG. Mostly primary sources, possibly self-promotion It was contested by DMacks ( talk · contribs) on 2023-02-26 with the comment: There was a seemingly-viable older revision (undeleted after PROD had expired) |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've noticed that high-quality articles for this page have been deleted in favor of a small blurb discrediting the method. Given there is high-quality research to support the method, I am surprised but not shocked. With love, I suggest that we protect this topic and allow it to grow. Ray Solano ( talk) 10:21, 18 January 2023 (UTC) Further, I'll add that in the future this work may be considered some of a health revolution, once it is made accessible to the public. So, I experience further sadness that one researcher who in the past dismissed the theory in favor of their own practice has led to even one person dismissing the quality of this practice (I saw that version of information cited in the old Wikipedia article as a reason to dismiss the work in an Amazon review). What a shame. Oh well :) now – that all may see and be exposed to the healing potential available here. I'd love to be able to give this article more time. Ray Solano ( talk) 07:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
I've proposed deletion of this article. Feel free to discuss here. Resequent ( talk) 14:47, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 26 February 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This page was
proposed for deletion by
Resequent (
talk ·
contribs) on 14 February 2023 with the comment: Fails WP:GNG. Mostly primary sources, possibly self-promotion It was contested by DMacks ( talk · contribs) on 2023-02-26 with the comment: There was a seemingly-viable older revision (undeleted after PROD had expired) |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've noticed that high-quality articles for this page have been deleted in favor of a small blurb discrediting the method. Given there is high-quality research to support the method, I am surprised but not shocked. With love, I suggest that we protect this topic and allow it to grow. Ray Solano ( talk) 10:21, 18 January 2023 (UTC) Further, I'll add that in the future this work may be considered some of a health revolution, once it is made accessible to the public. So, I experience further sadness that one researcher who in the past dismissed the theory in favor of their own practice has led to even one person dismissing the quality of this practice (I saw that version of information cited in the old Wikipedia article as a reason to dismiss the work in an Amazon review). What a shame. Oh well :) now – that all may see and be exposed to the healing potential available here. I'd love to be able to give this article more time. Ray Solano ( talk) 07:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
I've proposed deletion of this article. Feel free to discuss here. Resequent ( talk) 14:47, 14 February 2023 (UTC)