The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Dr. Swag Lord: Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d ( talk · contribs) Hi, I'll review this. 01:07, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Main concern 1: The short length of the article trigged some alarm bells for me. After doing a very basic search, I realized there are plenty of sources available the nominator could have used to broaden the article. Sources not used include: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. As of now, the article is clearly not broad enough for GA standards.
Main concern 2: I'm seeing way too many questionable sources used. This is a BLP which requires high-quality sources. Questionable sources include:
Other concerns:
All-in-all, I believe this article qualifies for a WP:QF since it's a long way from meeting multiple GA criteria. Good luck on improving the article in the future! Dr. Swag Lord ( talk) 01:29, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Dr. Swag Lord: Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d ( talk · contribs) Hi, I'll review this. 01:07, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Main concern 1: The short length of the article trigged some alarm bells for me. After doing a very basic search, I realized there are plenty of sources available the nominator could have used to broaden the article. Sources not used include: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. As of now, the article is clearly not broad enough for GA standards.
Main concern 2: I'm seeing way too many questionable sources used. This is a BLP which requires high-quality sources. Questionable sources include:
Other concerns:
All-in-all, I believe this article qualifies for a WP:QF since it's a long way from meeting multiple GA criteria. Good luck on improving the article in the future! Dr. Swag Lord ( talk) 01:29, 11 July 2024 (UTC)