This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
Andreasegde,
Your anal compulsion to reduce photo sizes is bizarre. I was wondering where you studied photography. I will remove my photo of Paul and Linda from the Wings section because I am tired of your infantile antics of making my photograph a postage stamp.
You win. But may I suggest that you get a life?
markestabrook Markestabrook 21:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
I shall start a new paragraph, because it makes my eyes water to keep flicking to the right... You are very right, Jooler, but where does it stop? 150px, 200px, 250px, 300px, 350px, and on and on. Reviewers look at 'References' first (in-line) and then at the 'flow' of the article. They don't like BIG pictures that get in the way of their review. If an article looks like a magazine it is very pleasing to read, but this thing we all work on is not that. Anyone can click on the photos and see them wonderfully displayed, so why should they be so big in the article? I prefer clicking on the photos to see them in all their glory, BTW. andreasegde 19:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
If other editors are unaware, Paul McCarntey is among the top three articles with the most categories at this moment. Efforts should be made to trim the categories to a reasonable level so that people can read the category list without being overwhelmed.
I have started with removing Category:Stamp designers. I saw nothing in the article about McCarney designing stamps, so I removed the category. If I am incorrect and if the category is really needed, then feel free to insert the category back into the article. Dr. Submillimeter 22:34, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Great article, but in the 1980s section the text states:
"In 1988 McCartney. released Снова в СССР, which was a collection of old Rock and roll hits - written by others - that McCartney had admired over the years. It was originally released in 1988, in the USSR, he is the most awesome singer this planet will ever seeElvis Costello (Declan Macmanus) and Juan Carlos Garcia Manzano Gandara."
I, not being an expert on the subject, have no idea what the orginal text before vandalism said; was it "featuring" or perhaps something else? I'd be much obliged if somebody who wrote the original text could come forward. Once again, well done to all concerned who've made contributions to this article. -- Liamshaw 22:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
I don't know much about it, but wasn't McCartney criticized for changing the order of Lennon/McCartney penned songs on some releases after Lennon's death? This would be suitable to include.
Hi guys, especially Andrew, sorry I've not been around to help. Article is looking great (at a glance, didn't have time to read it all hehe). Are you gonna try your luck at FAC? -- kingboyk 21:06, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
Andreasegde,
Your anal compulsion to reduce photo sizes is bizarre. I was wondering where you studied photography. I will remove my photo of Paul and Linda from the Wings section because I am tired of your infantile antics of making my photograph a postage stamp.
You win. But may I suggest that you get a life?
markestabrook Markestabrook 21:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
I shall start a new paragraph, because it makes my eyes water to keep flicking to the right... You are very right, Jooler, but where does it stop? 150px, 200px, 250px, 300px, 350px, and on and on. Reviewers look at 'References' first (in-line) and then at the 'flow' of the article. They don't like BIG pictures that get in the way of their review. If an article looks like a magazine it is very pleasing to read, but this thing we all work on is not that. Anyone can click on the photos and see them wonderfully displayed, so why should they be so big in the article? I prefer clicking on the photos to see them in all their glory, BTW. andreasegde 19:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
If other editors are unaware, Paul McCarntey is among the top three articles with the most categories at this moment. Efforts should be made to trim the categories to a reasonable level so that people can read the category list without being overwhelmed.
I have started with removing Category:Stamp designers. I saw nothing in the article about McCarney designing stamps, so I removed the category. If I am incorrect and if the category is really needed, then feel free to insert the category back into the article. Dr. Submillimeter 22:34, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Great article, but in the 1980s section the text states:
"In 1988 McCartney. released Снова в СССР, which was a collection of old Rock and roll hits - written by others - that McCartney had admired over the years. It was originally released in 1988, in the USSR, he is the most awesome singer this planet will ever seeElvis Costello (Declan Macmanus) and Juan Carlos Garcia Manzano Gandara."
I, not being an expert on the subject, have no idea what the orginal text before vandalism said; was it "featuring" or perhaps something else? I'd be much obliged if somebody who wrote the original text could come forward. Once again, well done to all concerned who've made contributions to this article. -- Liamshaw 22:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
I don't know much about it, but wasn't McCartney criticized for changing the order of Lennon/McCartney penned songs on some releases after Lennon's death? This would be suitable to include.
Hi guys, especially Andrew, sorry I've not been around to help. Article is looking great (at a glance, didn't have time to read it all hehe). Are you gonna try your luck at FAC? -- kingboyk 21:06, 18 February 2007 (UTC)