This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
COI heading removed as 1) no discussion initiated on the talk page and 2) content appears to be neutral
Use this tag to alert readers that the article may be biased by a conflict of interest, and to request help with an article that is biased or has other serious problems as a direct result of the editing done by the subject of the article or by a person with a close connection to the subject (e.g., public relations employees).
Do not use this tag unless there are significant or substantial problems with the article's neutrality as a result of the contributor's involvement. Like the other
![]() | The
neutrality of this article is
disputed. |
tags, this tag is not meant to be a badge of shame or to "warn the reader" about the identities of the editors.
Does this article (regardless of author) breach the neutrality definition? It does not seem to me that it does. It is either factual, or factual and referenced reporting of the subject's opinions. (Apologies, new to editing. I saw a presentation by Jimmy Wales recently and became something of a convert).
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I kindly ask the active editors of this article to review and consider for implementation the following edit:
The information which can be found at the end of the article: "The concern for the pigs in China angered many Chinese people and has led to him being removed from his post."
This sentence is not correct as Paul Donovan wasn't removed from his post but he was asked to take a leave of absence. Also – Paul and his employer (UBS) apologized for these words. If I can suggest an edit it would be as follows: "The concern for the pigs in China angered many Chinese people and has led to him being asked to take the leave of absence. Paul Donovan apologized for his words."
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-14/ubs-puts-economist-donovan-on-leave-to-contain-china-pig-fallout https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-13/ubs-apologizes-after-analyst-comment-sparks-outrage-in-china https://www.ft.com/content/82a517f2-8e6d-11e9-a24d-b42f641eca37 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=or6PBT_VTqM WROanna1862 ( talk) 15:52, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
I think that covers a lot of aspects from that story thus far. Please advise if acceptable. Regards, Spintendo 17:39, 14 June 2019 (UTC)While engaged in a discussion concerning Chinese consumer prices, Donovan commented that the pig virus causing the cost of pork to rise mattered to Chinese pigs and those who ate them. Donovan later apologized for his remarks before taking a leave of absence from UBS, saying "I made a mistake and I unwittingly used hugely culturally insensitive language." [1] Patrick Winters and Benjamin Robertson of Bloomberg noted that "local rivals of UBS, which have been trying to take bigger piece of a business dominated by the established Western wealth managers, were quick to condemn Donovan's comments." [2]
References
{{
request edit}}
template's answer parameter to read from |ans=yes
to |ans=no
. Thank you!![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Could you please review and consider for implementation the following edit:
He was Global Chief Economist for the Swiss financial services firm UBS Wealth Management until 14 June 2019.
He currently is Global Chief Economist for the Swiss financial services firm UBS Wealth Management.
Paul Donovan was officially reinstated to his position.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-49898296
Please advise if it is ok for me, an editor with conflict of interest, to implement such change directly.
Best regards, WROanna1862 ( talk) 08:05, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
COI heading removed as 1) no discussion initiated on the talk page and 2) content appears to be neutral
Use this tag to alert readers that the article may be biased by a conflict of interest, and to request help with an article that is biased or has other serious problems as a direct result of the editing done by the subject of the article or by a person with a close connection to the subject (e.g., public relations employees).
Do not use this tag unless there are significant or substantial problems with the article's neutrality as a result of the contributor's involvement. Like the other
![]() | The
neutrality of this article is
disputed. |
tags, this tag is not meant to be a badge of shame or to "warn the reader" about the identities of the editors.
Does this article (regardless of author) breach the neutrality definition? It does not seem to me that it does. It is either factual, or factual and referenced reporting of the subject's opinions. (Apologies, new to editing. I saw a presentation by Jimmy Wales recently and became something of a convert).
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I kindly ask the active editors of this article to review and consider for implementation the following edit:
The information which can be found at the end of the article: "The concern for the pigs in China angered many Chinese people and has led to him being removed from his post."
This sentence is not correct as Paul Donovan wasn't removed from his post but he was asked to take a leave of absence. Also – Paul and his employer (UBS) apologized for these words. If I can suggest an edit it would be as follows: "The concern for the pigs in China angered many Chinese people and has led to him being asked to take the leave of absence. Paul Donovan apologized for his words."
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-14/ubs-puts-economist-donovan-on-leave-to-contain-china-pig-fallout https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-13/ubs-apologizes-after-analyst-comment-sparks-outrage-in-china https://www.ft.com/content/82a517f2-8e6d-11e9-a24d-b42f641eca37 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=or6PBT_VTqM WROanna1862 ( talk) 15:52, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
I think that covers a lot of aspects from that story thus far. Please advise if acceptable. Regards, Spintendo 17:39, 14 June 2019 (UTC)While engaged in a discussion concerning Chinese consumer prices, Donovan commented that the pig virus causing the cost of pork to rise mattered to Chinese pigs and those who ate them. Donovan later apologized for his remarks before taking a leave of absence from UBS, saying "I made a mistake and I unwittingly used hugely culturally insensitive language." [1] Patrick Winters and Benjamin Robertson of Bloomberg noted that "local rivals of UBS, which have been trying to take bigger piece of a business dominated by the established Western wealth managers, were quick to condemn Donovan's comments." [2]
References
{{
request edit}}
template's answer parameter to read from |ans=yes
to |ans=no
. Thank you!![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Could you please review and consider for implementation the following edit:
He was Global Chief Economist for the Swiss financial services firm UBS Wealth Management until 14 June 2019.
He currently is Global Chief Economist for the Swiss financial services firm UBS Wealth Management.
Paul Donovan was officially reinstated to his position.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-49898296
Please advise if it is ok for me, an editor with conflict of interest, to implement such change directly.
Best regards, WROanna1862 ( talk) 08:05, 2 October 2019 (UTC)