This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity: Texts / Catholicism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Religious texts (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Mid-importance).

Pascendi analyzes Modernism in excruciating detail, but the oath was not prescribed by it, but by a latter document. See Roman Modernism. Regards. WikiSceptic 08:44, 4 December 2005 (UTC) reply

Yes, you're quite correct. The oath wasn't promulgated till 1910 with the Motu Proprio "Sacrorum antistitum". I've deleted this bit. Alan162 ( talk) 23:01, 7 June 2010 (UTC) reply

The Jews are not mentioned in the encyclical, to say nothing of being eternally damned in it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.28.136 ( talk) 13:00, 30 March 2009 (UTC) reply