![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
CactiStaccingCrane, you have been trying to remove/change large sections of this page, and your changes have been reverted. Many editors have spent time working on this page and you seem to want to remove all their work and start over. Since editors have objected to what you are doing it is time to discuss here on the talk page. See Wikipedia:Consensus. The article can use improvement. Can you outline what you propose to do? Changing section by section, and incorporating good material already there, is a better approach. An overview article like this may well need reorganizing since it has just grown over time. StarryGrandma ( talk) 00:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
@
User:CactiStaccingCrane, I am not at all an expert at the topic really
then sorry but I totally do not trust your judgement on the re-structuring of this article, which is very technical. You cannot really say that there is a lack of sources
on particle physics, either! Given that particle physics is one of the most studied branches of physics with tens of thousands of publications per year. The major problem with your restructuring is also that one cannot really notice what you changed and what you kept or moved around. If you would like to improve this article I would suggest to do so gradually, with a proper edit message for each step, so that other editors can see what you changed.
Yakme (
talk)
06:56, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Just wondering why this isn't high energy physics? I would think that is the WP:COMMONNAME, at least among physicists. One complication, I don't know if it should have the hyphen or not. Gah4 ( talk) 18:58, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 16 December 2023. Further details are available
on the course page. Peer reviewers:
Meme2611,
Beastkiller6142.
— Assignment last updated by Timbenuka ( talk) 03:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
@ Drbogdan Are plans and speculation notable aspects of particle physics? News about plans? Do we want to have research proposals from groups doing particle physics? Grant proposals? Etc. I say no, only verifiable information about particle physics here.
It seems reasonable to mention the P5 group but the details of the P5 group belong on Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel. Johnjbarton ( talk) 16:40, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
CactiStaccingCrane, you have been trying to remove/change large sections of this page, and your changes have been reverted. Many editors have spent time working on this page and you seem to want to remove all their work and start over. Since editors have objected to what you are doing it is time to discuss here on the talk page. See Wikipedia:Consensus. The article can use improvement. Can you outline what you propose to do? Changing section by section, and incorporating good material already there, is a better approach. An overview article like this may well need reorganizing since it has just grown over time. StarryGrandma ( talk) 00:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
@
User:CactiStaccingCrane, I am not at all an expert at the topic really
then sorry but I totally do not trust your judgement on the re-structuring of this article, which is very technical. You cannot really say that there is a lack of sources
on particle physics, either! Given that particle physics is one of the most studied branches of physics with tens of thousands of publications per year. The major problem with your restructuring is also that one cannot really notice what you changed and what you kept or moved around. If you would like to improve this article I would suggest to do so gradually, with a proper edit message for each step, so that other editors can see what you changed.
Yakme (
talk)
06:56, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Just wondering why this isn't high energy physics? I would think that is the WP:COMMONNAME, at least among physicists. One complication, I don't know if it should have the hyphen or not. Gah4 ( talk) 18:58, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 16 December 2023. Further details are available
on the course page. Peer reviewers:
Meme2611,
Beastkiller6142.
— Assignment last updated by Timbenuka ( talk) 03:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
@ Drbogdan Are plans and speculation notable aspects of particle physics? News about plans? Do we want to have research proposals from groups doing particle physics? Grant proposals? Etc. I say no, only verifiable information about particle physics here.
It seems reasonable to mention the P5 group but the details of the P5 group belong on Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel. Johnjbarton ( talk) 16:40, 8 December 2023 (UTC)