![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
... this is the same pretentious showing-off a spurious "correctness" that puts Caravaggio at " Michelangelo Merisi". The fact is, that everyone looking for information on Parmigianino will be redirected, so this sophmoric attempt at looking "knowing" is harmless after all. But is Palladio next? Bronzino? Middle-class Americans all have middle initials and surnames. Italian painters and hip-hop personalities do not. To understand this is already a beginning. -- Wetman 17:40, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
Despite whether you think that the article name is "pretentious", the fact remains that this was the name of the artist. It is the most unambiguous name to give the article, which I believe is a naming guideline. Where the artist in question was known by more than one name, it seems to make sense to redirect to the most "official" name.
As per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names), this page should be moved to the common names. The move fits perfectly with the examples listed there and with the way other artists of the period are currently named. -- Sketchee 06:39, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. Dragons flight 05:15, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
I see that some clean-up of this article has occurred since the April 2006 tagging, including cleaning up the results of the Dec '05 re-renaming. What I don't see is comments from either User:Moe Epsilon or User:Attilios on what they thought needed cleaning-up. Here are some problems that I see:
Wetman, I agree Parmigiano is neither correct nor up to date, but it is/was widely used by such major scholars as A Hayatt Major or here by the NMM in London (try googling "P.. painter"): [ [1]]0 Johnbod 17:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
I guess it may be better, if we write also the name of the portrait it is widely known - Antea, -- Zara-arush ( talk) 21:58, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
... this is the same pretentious showing-off a spurious "correctness" that puts Caravaggio at " Michelangelo Merisi". The fact is, that everyone looking for information on Parmigianino will be redirected, so this sophmoric attempt at looking "knowing" is harmless after all. But is Palladio next? Bronzino? Middle-class Americans all have middle initials and surnames. Italian painters and hip-hop personalities do not. To understand this is already a beginning. -- Wetman 17:40, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
Despite whether you think that the article name is "pretentious", the fact remains that this was the name of the artist. It is the most unambiguous name to give the article, which I believe is a naming guideline. Where the artist in question was known by more than one name, it seems to make sense to redirect to the most "official" name.
As per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names), this page should be moved to the common names. The move fits perfectly with the examples listed there and with the way other artists of the period are currently named. -- Sketchee 06:39, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. Dragons flight 05:15, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
I see that some clean-up of this article has occurred since the April 2006 tagging, including cleaning up the results of the Dec '05 re-renaming. What I don't see is comments from either User:Moe Epsilon or User:Attilios on what they thought needed cleaning-up. Here are some problems that I see:
Wetman, I agree Parmigiano is neither correct nor up to date, but it is/was widely used by such major scholars as A Hayatt Major or here by the NMM in London (try googling "P.. painter"): [ [1]]0 Johnbod 17:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
I guess it may be better, if we write also the name of the portrait it is widely known - Antea, -- Zara-arush ( talk) 21:58, 1 October 2012 (UTC)