Parliament of 1327 is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 13, 2019.
Article milestones Date Process Result June 18, 2018 Good article nominee Listed October 7, 2018 Featured article candidate Promoted August 20, 2018 Peer review Reviewed
Current status: Featured article

This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 9 February 2018 by reviewer DGG ( talk · contribs). History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1 .

Good to know that the colors meet standards, but IMO garish is the word I'd use to describe the colors, especially that pink for that seymour phillips quote. Just seem distracting colors that add nothing. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 12:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Galobtter: I understand; I think it's also useful for breaking up the walls-of-dry-as-old-bones text. Would the pale yellow throughout be a satisfactory compromise? (See the current version. As well as being consistent—I see what you mean about garish; the yellow is more discreet, no?) —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia / cheap sh*t room} 12:13, 17 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Much better. Thanks! Galobtter ( pingó mió) 12:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC) reply

No, Thank you; I wouldn't have noticed it otherwise! —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia / cheap sh*t room} 12:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC) reply

This review is transcluded from Talk:Parliament of 1327/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 ( talk · contribs) 15:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC) reply

I'll start this in a couple of days. auntieruth (talk) 15:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Made a couple of tweaks to the lead toclarify who "he" was. Removed duplicated information. Also, I suggest using Infobox Historical Event to summarize the data. It will help to make theplayers and opponents clearer. auntieruth (talk) 14:42, 15 June 2018 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   needs infobox.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR): d ( copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a ( major aspects): b ( focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• Yo Auntieruth55 many thanks for your tweaks, much appreciate as always. TBH—Infoboxes are a little bit political at the moment aren't they (Read=The most political thing on WP!!!) and I try and avoid radicalism where possible  :) —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia / cheap sh*t room} 17:27, 16 June 2018 (UTC) reply

• Serial Number 54129...really? Info boxes are political? I don't think so. I'll pass it, but.... 14:17, 18 June 2018 (UTC) reply

• ​I mean, discretionary sanctions and all that? —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia / cheap sh*t room} 14:21, 18 June 2018 (UTC) reply