This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mathematics Mid‑priority This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale. Electrical engineering Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Should the code definition be Hc^T=0 instead of H^Tc=0? -- 169.235.24.187 ( talk) 00:32, 12 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Depends on which book you read it from. Either way, this article could do with some consistency, in choice of symbols too. 80.6.149.158 ( talk) 13:55, 24 May 2010 (UTC) reply

The two equations for G and H only hold if the linear code is systematic. I propose a change to indicate so. Phosphoricx ( talk) 03:38, 24 April 2008 (UTC) reply

I think, the is a minus missing in the equation for H. In the current form it is only correct for binary codes. However, the explanation for binary codes is there, but not for code using other finite fields. If I am correct, it is

${\displaystyle H={\begin{bmatrix}-P^{T}|I_{n-k}\end{bmatrix}}}$

-- Sporenfrosch ( talk) 00:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC) reply