This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bible Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Greece Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I was unable to find a copy on the internet, except for 2 images which are very hard to make out. If anyone has a link to it, that would be a valuable addition to the article. BTW, I don't know what reliable source claims P94 was originally the entire book of Romans, let alone of the entire NT. I have never heard of any papyrus of the entire NT. How do we know that all of P94 was not someone's copy of a section of Romans? I deleted those implications which lack reliable sources. ( PeacePeace ( talk) 20:11, 19 June 2018 (UTC)) reply