Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " In the news" column on September 1, 2016. | ||||||||||
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on June 15, 2023. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument:
|
I had put up a {{ future}} tag and worked on tenses. Bush's announcement hasn't happened yet according to http://www.whitehouse.gov/, though the Ocean Conservancy press release uses past tense. Looks like Ocean Conservancy released their press release early and all the media sources are mixing up their tenses as well. - BT 19:39, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Can we just have a map of Hawaai? My first impression was that it was located in Mexico! Borisblue 21:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
I agree, we really could use a specialized map that doesn't include the rest of the country... T. S. Rice 00:01, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
There is a NOAA map which could be used or adapted, since it's a U.S. gov document. Eluchil404 00:18, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Isn't the area south of the Antarctic circle a protected area? 217.33.200.148 11:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
An explaanation of the difference would be helpful, especially since the links appear to be redirects to the same article which doesn't explain it either. Septentrionalis 13:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Rmhermen, sorry if it seems like I'm doing a simple revert to your edit. I meant to edit earlier, as I thought listing both California and Montana to be a little excessive, considering that we also have two other size comparisions. As my edit description notes, I think that Montana is closer in size, so it is possibly a more telling comparison. I've noticed before for other geography articles on Wikipedia (and elsewhere) that California is often used as a comparison for size, whether or not it is actually correct (hey, it just sounds better to compare it California (I guess)). Anyway, I hope this is minor; I just wanted to explain the edit so as not create the wrong impression, as you are also an administrator. Cheers Ufwuct 00:42, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't understand proportions given here at all. If the area is 1.5 Mio km2 it means a volume more than four times larger than Montana and almost five times larger than Germany, not "approximately equal" or "slightly larger". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.248.155.238 ( talk) 11:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Are these islands part of the state of Hawaii? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.123.232.156 ( talk • contribs)
The citation (number 1) gives no indication that Hawaiians will vote on a native Hawaiian name for the new monument. Unless I completely passed over it, though I read over it a few times. -- 67.114.233.162 20:04, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm concerned about a series of edits made by an IP address that removed comments cited to a variety of sources, and replaced them with language favorable to and/or supportive of the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council:
Some of these edits may well be worth including, but some of the deleted, sourced material should certainly be brought back into the article. I have no quarrel with the WPRFMC presenting another side of the argument, but they should not removed criticism in the process. -- Dhartung | Talk 07:27, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm almost sure that when the national monument was created it superceded the National Wildlife Refuge, as having both would be redundant. As such, the it should be merged here. SeanMD80 talk | contribs 01:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi Viriditas. I will be reviewing this article. Off the bat I see a few things:
I'll go through the article for anything else. Overall, it looks good. — Mattisse ( Talk) 21:51, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
There is a small visitors' center located in Hilo, ironically on the very opposite end of the island chain! http://hawaiireef.noaa.gov/center/welcome.html I was going to do an article on the building in which it is located because it is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. There was not much to say about the building, but can mention the center in the same article and link it here, unless someone beats me to it. I also have a couple pictures of the center. W Nowicki ( talk) 21:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
I was working on replacing a dead link when I came across this:
All commercial fishing eliminated in 2010
Peaceray (
talk)
00:15, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: horizontal tab character in |title=
at position 20 (
help)Peaceray ( talk) 07:47, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
A B-class article. Could use a good list of the major species of animals and plants in the monument, especially the ones found nowhere else. Also necessary is a brief overview of the islands in the monument, with a focus on ecology. Nothing too in-depth, leave that for
NWHI. This article's focus is the monument, whereas the other article's focus is the islands themselves. Information is also needed on how to access the monument, who can access, etc.
SeanMD80
talk |
contribs
04:02, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
|
Last edited at 17:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 02:14, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Can you fish? Commercial fish? Drill or mine? Camp? etc.. -- Green C 00:36, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Pronunciation in parentheses in the first line is essental. I'd just do it myself if I could.-- Wetman ( talk) 19:30, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:00, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " In the news" column on September 1, 2016. | ||||||||||
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on June 15, 2023. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument:
|
I had put up a {{ future}} tag and worked on tenses. Bush's announcement hasn't happened yet according to http://www.whitehouse.gov/, though the Ocean Conservancy press release uses past tense. Looks like Ocean Conservancy released their press release early and all the media sources are mixing up their tenses as well. - BT 19:39, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Can we just have a map of Hawaai? My first impression was that it was located in Mexico! Borisblue 21:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
I agree, we really could use a specialized map that doesn't include the rest of the country... T. S. Rice 00:01, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
There is a NOAA map which could be used or adapted, since it's a U.S. gov document. Eluchil404 00:18, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Isn't the area south of the Antarctic circle a protected area? 217.33.200.148 11:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
An explaanation of the difference would be helpful, especially since the links appear to be redirects to the same article which doesn't explain it either. Septentrionalis 13:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Rmhermen, sorry if it seems like I'm doing a simple revert to your edit. I meant to edit earlier, as I thought listing both California and Montana to be a little excessive, considering that we also have two other size comparisions. As my edit description notes, I think that Montana is closer in size, so it is possibly a more telling comparison. I've noticed before for other geography articles on Wikipedia (and elsewhere) that California is often used as a comparison for size, whether or not it is actually correct (hey, it just sounds better to compare it California (I guess)). Anyway, I hope this is minor; I just wanted to explain the edit so as not create the wrong impression, as you are also an administrator. Cheers Ufwuct 00:42, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't understand proportions given here at all. If the area is 1.5 Mio km2 it means a volume more than four times larger than Montana and almost five times larger than Germany, not "approximately equal" or "slightly larger". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.248.155.238 ( talk) 11:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Are these islands part of the state of Hawaii? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.123.232.156 ( talk • contribs)
The citation (number 1) gives no indication that Hawaiians will vote on a native Hawaiian name for the new monument. Unless I completely passed over it, though I read over it a few times. -- 67.114.233.162 20:04, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm concerned about a series of edits made by an IP address that removed comments cited to a variety of sources, and replaced them with language favorable to and/or supportive of the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council:
Some of these edits may well be worth including, but some of the deleted, sourced material should certainly be brought back into the article. I have no quarrel with the WPRFMC presenting another side of the argument, but they should not removed criticism in the process. -- Dhartung | Talk 07:27, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm almost sure that when the national monument was created it superceded the National Wildlife Refuge, as having both would be redundant. As such, the it should be merged here. SeanMD80 talk | contribs 01:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi Viriditas. I will be reviewing this article. Off the bat I see a few things:
I'll go through the article for anything else. Overall, it looks good. — Mattisse ( Talk) 21:51, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
There is a small visitors' center located in Hilo, ironically on the very opposite end of the island chain! http://hawaiireef.noaa.gov/center/welcome.html I was going to do an article on the building in which it is located because it is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. There was not much to say about the building, but can mention the center in the same article and link it here, unless someone beats me to it. I also have a couple pictures of the center. W Nowicki ( talk) 21:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
I was working on replacing a dead link when I came across this:
All commercial fishing eliminated in 2010
Peaceray (
talk)
00:15, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: horizontal tab character in |title=
at position 20 (
help)Peaceray ( talk) 07:47, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
A B-class article. Could use a good list of the major species of animals and plants in the monument, especially the ones found nowhere else. Also necessary is a brief overview of the islands in the monument, with a focus on ecology. Nothing too in-depth, leave that for
NWHI. This article's focus is the monument, whereas the other article's focus is the islands themselves. Information is also needed on how to access the monument, who can access, etc.
SeanMD80
talk |
contribs
04:02, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
|
Last edited at 17:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 02:14, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Can you fish? Commercial fish? Drill or mine? Camp? etc.. -- Green C 00:36, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Pronunciation in parentheses in the first line is essental. I'd just do it myself if I could.-- Wetman ( talk) 19:30, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:00, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)