This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Panzerfaust 3 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I dont think the "fire salamander" is a real weapons system, I cant find any other reference to it online or in any databases, not even fictional references Shouldnt it be removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.156.19.49 ( talk) 16:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
A Panzerfaust is not a rocket launcher! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.73.123.201 ( talk) 23:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Amatol is a cheap, but far from the best, as an explosive.Beyond doubt, the warhead uses Octol a mix of TNT and HMX.The article must be edicted. Agre22 ( talk) 00:01, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Agre22
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Panzerfaust 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.sandrachenugodefroy.fr/2009/09/25/raider-suisse-rampant-avec-un-panzerfaust-au-src-2009/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:56, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
I tried to look up the source and finding information on the use of the Panzerfaust 3 in the Austrian Bundesheer, but the only official documents I could find were a discussion in the troop-newspaper Truppendienst from 1994 were it was discussed, that Austria needs something to fill the gap in medium-range anti-tank weaponry and the Panzerfaust 3 was one of the discussed candidates. But I could not find anything, wether from articles and publications, nor from personal experience that suggests the use of the Panzerfaust 3 in the Austrian Armed Forces. As I cannot find the source ( Jones, Richard D. Jane's Infantry Weapons 2009/2010. Jane's Information Group; 35 edition (January 27, 2009). ISBN 978-0-7106-2869-5) anywhere, I have to assume that this is a mistake or the source is wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SovietskyAleks ( talk • contribs) 08:05, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Panzerfaust 3 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I dont think the "fire salamander" is a real weapons system, I cant find any other reference to it online or in any databases, not even fictional references Shouldnt it be removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.156.19.49 ( talk) 16:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
A Panzerfaust is not a rocket launcher! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.73.123.201 ( talk) 23:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Amatol is a cheap, but far from the best, as an explosive.Beyond doubt, the warhead uses Octol a mix of TNT and HMX.The article must be edicted. Agre22 ( talk) 00:01, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Agre22
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Panzerfaust 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.sandrachenugodefroy.fr/2009/09/25/raider-suisse-rampant-avec-un-panzerfaust-au-src-2009/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:56, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
I tried to look up the source and finding information on the use of the Panzerfaust 3 in the Austrian Bundesheer, but the only official documents I could find were a discussion in the troop-newspaper Truppendienst from 1994 were it was discussed, that Austria needs something to fill the gap in medium-range anti-tank weaponry and the Panzerfaust 3 was one of the discussed candidates. But I could not find anything, wether from articles and publications, nor from personal experience that suggests the use of the Panzerfaust 3 in the Austrian Armed Forces. As I cannot find the source ( Jones, Richard D. Jane's Infantry Weapons 2009/2010. Jane's Information Group; 35 edition (January 27, 2009). ISBN 978-0-7106-2869-5) anywhere, I have to assume that this is a mistake or the source is wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SovietskyAleks ( talk • contribs) 08:05, 20 April 2022 (UTC)