This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / European / German / World War II C‑class This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military land vehicles task force Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force European military history task force German military history task force World War II task force Germany Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page should not be speedily deleted because the source is clearly cited, unlike the original which had no citations. A split off variants section is the norm for large numbers of variants with large sections. As for no discussion, there is no need for discussion for obvious improvements!!-- Petebutt ( talk) 12:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC) reply

It may be referenced, but what advantage does splitting the article give?

There is a stronger argument for splitting off the SPGs (although there is no content sufficient to justify this). Splitting off though the tank variants, as you have done here, simply makes the main article unreadable. Andy Dingley ( talk) 13:21, 31 October 2015 (UTC) reply