![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There's a duplication of a paragraph, that is found both in the introduction and a section called secretions. Where is the right place for that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mifam ( talk • contribs) 09:24, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
The image of the Paneth cell
appears to be a copyright violation. The same image appears in the Encyclopaedia Britannica website under Paneth cells http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/441200/Paneths-cell#tab=active~checked%2Citems~checked&title=Paneth%E2%80%99s%20cell%20--%20Britannica%20Online%20Encyclopedia, yet the image data here suggests it is the creator's own photo. However, the creator's talk page is dotted with small warnings about appropriate sourcing of images, use of tags etc. Can an admin look into this please?
Mattopaedia ( talk) 23:54, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
LOL IWAS HE ONE WHO TOOK THAT PICTURE.. DID YOU SEE THE NBAME OF THE CREDITOR FROM THAT SITE? IT SAYS JPOGI LOL I GOT THE ORIGINAL FILE HERE IN MY PC.. I WAS 1STYEAR MEDICAL STUDENT WHEN I TOOK THAT PICTURE FROM MY CLASSMATE'S CAMERA FROM OUR INSTITUTIONS MICROSCOPE.;. THAT WAS 3 YEARS AGO.. sorry for tha caps, im in a hurry.. i forgot to change, got no time to change.. take care my friend
it doesnt mean that when you see a picture from other site, they didnt got from wikipedia.. Jpogi ( talk) 12:10, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
This page is embarrassing to WP. I will try but wow what a mess.-- Akrasia25 ( talk) 18:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
I believe I have added enough research and medical sources. Is it OK to remove? Irena.Buskova ( talk) 11:44, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There's a duplication of a paragraph, that is found both in the introduction and a section called secretions. Where is the right place for that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mifam ( talk • contribs) 09:24, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
The image of the Paneth cell
appears to be a copyright violation. The same image appears in the Encyclopaedia Britannica website under Paneth cells http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/441200/Paneths-cell#tab=active~checked%2Citems~checked&title=Paneth%E2%80%99s%20cell%20--%20Britannica%20Online%20Encyclopedia, yet the image data here suggests it is the creator's own photo. However, the creator's talk page is dotted with small warnings about appropriate sourcing of images, use of tags etc. Can an admin look into this please?
Mattopaedia ( talk) 23:54, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
LOL IWAS HE ONE WHO TOOK THAT PICTURE.. DID YOU SEE THE NBAME OF THE CREDITOR FROM THAT SITE? IT SAYS JPOGI LOL I GOT THE ORIGINAL FILE HERE IN MY PC.. I WAS 1STYEAR MEDICAL STUDENT WHEN I TOOK THAT PICTURE FROM MY CLASSMATE'S CAMERA FROM OUR INSTITUTIONS MICROSCOPE.;. THAT WAS 3 YEARS AGO.. sorry for tha caps, im in a hurry.. i forgot to change, got no time to change.. take care my friend
it doesnt mean that when you see a picture from other site, they didnt got from wikipedia.. Jpogi ( talk) 12:10, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
This page is embarrassing to WP. I will try but wow what a mess.-- Akrasia25 ( talk) 18:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
I believe I have added enough research and medical sources. Is it OK to remove? Irena.Buskova ( talk) 11:44, 19 January 2023 (UTC)