This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all
COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to
join and to participate in
project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19 articles
Problematic of the above reading from a theoretical standpoint is that it leaves out a crucial aspect of a Hegelian system: any order within the system is founded on an exception to the order itself.
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Proposed move is clearly not getting consensus (
non-admin closure) (
t ·
c) buidhe 09:39, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
WP:SUBTITLE does not necessarily says all subtitles should be removed. I think this title is OK as is. –
Ammarpad (
talk) 04:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The only of the five
WP:CRITERIA that I see affected by the proposed move is conciseness. And I'm not sure how the existing title is okay seeing as colons aren't used before subtitles where the title ends in an exclamation mark.
207.161.86.162 (
talk) 05:00, 13 December 2020 (UTC)reply
But you're not asking to remove only colon from the title. If that's what you want, please adjust the request. –
Ammarpad (
talk) 05:04, 13 December 2020 (UTC)reply
I was merely addressing the assertion that [you] think this title is OK as is.
207.161.86.162 (
talk) 05:06, 13 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Must oppose. Much clearer this way.
Hyperbolick (
talk) 05:34, 16 December 2020 (UTC)reply
This move would cause confusion with the
pandemic article, the only thing distinguishing Zizek's book being an exclamation mark. Perhaps consider moving to Pandemic! (book)?Extua (
talk) 11:01, 16 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all
COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to
join and to participate in
project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19 articles
Problematic of the above reading from a theoretical standpoint is that it leaves out a crucial aspect of a Hegelian system: any order within the system is founded on an exception to the order itself.
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Proposed move is clearly not getting consensus (
non-admin closure) (
t ·
c) buidhe 09:39, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
WP:SUBTITLE does not necessarily says all subtitles should be removed. I think this title is OK as is. –
Ammarpad (
talk) 04:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The only of the five
WP:CRITERIA that I see affected by the proposed move is conciseness. And I'm not sure how the existing title is okay seeing as colons aren't used before subtitles where the title ends in an exclamation mark.
207.161.86.162 (
talk) 05:00, 13 December 2020 (UTC)reply
But you're not asking to remove only colon from the title. If that's what you want, please adjust the request. –
Ammarpad (
talk) 05:04, 13 December 2020 (UTC)reply
I was merely addressing the assertion that [you] think this title is OK as is.
207.161.86.162 (
talk) 05:06, 13 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Must oppose. Much clearer this way.
Hyperbolick (
talk) 05:34, 16 December 2020 (UTC)reply
This move would cause confusion with the
pandemic article, the only thing distinguishing Zizek's book being an exclamation mark. Perhaps consider moving to Pandemic! (book)?Extua (
talk) 11:01, 16 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.