This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
article formated unnecessary information removed Indicom217 ( talk)indicom217 Akhil Kumar Singh Paliwal S/O Anil Kumar Singh Paliwal S/O Ram Charan Singh Paliwal Belonging To Village-Fatehpur (Manikpur) Post - Saidahe Distic- Ambedkar Nagar State - Uttar Pradesh a Varry Well Educated Family In Fatehpur Village — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.133.178 ( talk) 10:07, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
he is a software engg completed his school from Gurukul Public School 2010. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thevaibhav2221 ( talk • contribs) 16:13, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi ! Ekdalian , In this current version of the article the sources which are used to mentions them as a sub caste of Kanyakubja Brahmins are not valid because :
1. First source used in this is not reliable because the current source is a reprint of Raj Era sources you can check from here : People of India
2. Second sources used is not reliable according to this , because the book is using the same Raj Era and AnSI as their reference.
3. And the 3rd and 4th sources does not mention anything about Paliwals when you search in both the 3rd & 4th in google books.
Now you can check the below sources :
Current sources using this book : Kanyakubja Vanshavali as the base which was also used by britishers but its unreliable according to Wikipedia rules as these kind of vanshawlis were written for the praise of their own community. Now in this vanshwali , Bhumihars are also mentioned as Brahmins but they are not Brahmins see this comment of Sitush in this summary. This vanshavli also mentions Sarupareen as there subcaste but in the counter of this book , Saryupareens printed their own vanshawli declaring themselves different community than Kanyakubjas Saryupain Vanshavali in this book they discard the claim of being a subcaste of Kanyakubja. Manoj Singh Gaur ( talk) 05:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
article formated unnecessary information removed Indicom217 ( talk)indicom217 Akhil Kumar Singh Paliwal S/O Anil Kumar Singh Paliwal S/O Ram Charan Singh Paliwal Belonging To Village-Fatehpur (Manikpur) Post - Saidahe Distic- Ambedkar Nagar State - Uttar Pradesh a Varry Well Educated Family In Fatehpur Village — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.133.178 ( talk) 10:07, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
he is a software engg completed his school from Gurukul Public School 2010. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thevaibhav2221 ( talk • contribs) 16:13, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi ! Ekdalian , In this current version of the article the sources which are used to mentions them as a sub caste of Kanyakubja Brahmins are not valid because :
1. First source used in this is not reliable because the current source is a reprint of Raj Era sources you can check from here : People of India
2. Second sources used is not reliable according to this , because the book is using the same Raj Era and AnSI as their reference.
3. And the 3rd and 4th sources does not mention anything about Paliwals when you search in both the 3rd & 4th in google books.
Now you can check the below sources :
Current sources using this book : Kanyakubja Vanshavali as the base which was also used by britishers but its unreliable according to Wikipedia rules as these kind of vanshawlis were written for the praise of their own community. Now in this vanshwali , Bhumihars are also mentioned as Brahmins but they are not Brahmins see this comment of Sitush in this summary. This vanshavli also mentions Sarupareen as there subcaste but in the counter of this book , Saryupareens printed their own vanshawli declaring themselves different community than Kanyakubjas Saryupain Vanshavali in this book they discard the claim of being a subcaste of Kanyakubja. Manoj Singh Gaur ( talk) 05:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)