![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I opened this section to call attention to the reversion of unsupported edits by User:Netherzone stripping this section of all refs/citations and valid list external links. These were valid useful and relevant links & references, and User:Netherzone made a blanket deletion without stating any reference-based reason(s), and without a prior TALK page discussion. Any such blanket edit should have instead been discussed/proposed here first to gain consensus. I've manually reverted to the status quo ante 7 Sept 2020 version by User:Robert Jan van de Hoek. TashaB ( talk) 22:04, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Fellow editors, 1) I have consistently asserted that 1) I have no relationship with the Public Art in Public Places archive or its staff. 2) I have defended my in-text references to this organization as a valid, relevant, accurate online source, whose "reliability" has never been questioned in the professional art archives world (where is your evidence to the contrary?). 3) I have consistently asked for your SPECIFIC objections to the validity of any of these in-text references or external links (in lists of "see also" or "ext. links"), and you give NONE. Slamming my editing reputation seems a COVER for avoiding actual and specific issues. There has not been one criticism of this archive as a "Reliable source". Not ONE. So if any of you would care to legitimately discuss specific reasons why these references are anything LESS than factual, useful, accurate, & valid ("reliable source" criteria), then fine, proceed. We'll have a good discussion. Otherwise, you're compromising your own reputations for fairness and impartiality by continuing to impugn my WP credibility. TashaB ( talk) 22:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I opened this section to call attention to the reversion of unsupported edits by User:Netherzone stripping this section of all refs/citations and valid list external links. These were valid useful and relevant links & references, and User:Netherzone made a blanket deletion without stating any reference-based reason(s), and without a prior TALK page discussion. Any such blanket edit should have instead been discussed/proposed here first to gain consensus. I've manually reverted to the status quo ante 7 Sept 2020 version by User:Robert Jan van de Hoek. TashaB ( talk) 22:04, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Fellow editors, 1) I have consistently asserted that 1) I have no relationship with the Public Art in Public Places archive or its staff. 2) I have defended my in-text references to this organization as a valid, relevant, accurate online source, whose "reliability" has never been questioned in the professional art archives world (where is your evidence to the contrary?). 3) I have consistently asked for your SPECIFIC objections to the validity of any of these in-text references or external links (in lists of "see also" or "ext. links"), and you give NONE. Slamming my editing reputation seems a COVER for avoiding actual and specific issues. There has not been one criticism of this archive as a "Reliable source". Not ONE. So if any of you would care to legitimately discuss specific reasons why these references are anything LESS than factual, useful, accurate, & valid ("reliable source" criteria), then fine, proceed. We'll have a good discussion. Otherwise, you're compromising your own reputations for fairness and impartiality by continuing to impugn my WP credibility. TashaB ( talk) 22:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)