This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Paleotempestology has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 2, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
This
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
A fact from Paleotempestology appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 30 April 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
The article states that "Paleotempestology is the estimation of tropical cyclone activity with the help of proxy data" but the "Examples" section lists two non-tropical cyclones. This appears to be a contradiction. GeoWriter ( talk) 19:14, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Some source references in this Wikipedia article have wiki links for academic networking websites ResearchGate and Academia. Copyright of academic journal articles is almost always held by the publisher not the author. Many authors using these networking websites appear to violate publisher's copyright by uploading articles from journals. The Introduction section of Wikipedia's article on ResearchGate states "A study found that over half of the uploaded papers appear to infringe copyright, because the authors uploaded the publisher's version.". Wikipedia should avoid promoting possible copyright violations. I think that Wikipedia editors and Wikipedia could be held legally liable for copyright infringement punishment by the copyright holders for directing people to examples of copyright violation. Therefore, I suggest such wiki links should be removed from this Wikipedia article. GeoWriter ( talk) 21:19, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk)
05:32, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk). Self-nominated at 15:44, 4 April 2020 (UTC).
GeoWriter is observing that the list of examples of palaeotempestology sites is becoming overlong. I think the proposal in their edit summary to split it off to List of paleotempestology records might make sense. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 18:32, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Paleotempestology has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 2, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
This
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
A fact from Paleotempestology appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 30 April 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
The article states that "Paleotempestology is the estimation of tropical cyclone activity with the help of proxy data" but the "Examples" section lists two non-tropical cyclones. This appears to be a contradiction. GeoWriter ( talk) 19:14, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Some source references in this Wikipedia article have wiki links for academic networking websites ResearchGate and Academia. Copyright of academic journal articles is almost always held by the publisher not the author. Many authors using these networking websites appear to violate publisher's copyright by uploading articles from journals. The Introduction section of Wikipedia's article on ResearchGate states "A study found that over half of the uploaded papers appear to infringe copyright, because the authors uploaded the publisher's version.". Wikipedia should avoid promoting possible copyright violations. I think that Wikipedia editors and Wikipedia could be held legally liable for copyright infringement punishment by the copyright holders for directing people to examples of copyright violation. Therefore, I suggest such wiki links should be removed from this Wikipedia article. GeoWriter ( talk) 21:19, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk)
05:32, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk). Self-nominated at 15:44, 4 April 2020 (UTC).
GeoWriter is observing that the list of examples of palaeotempestology sites is becoming overlong. I think the proposal in their edit summary to split it off to List of paleotempestology records might make sense. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 18:32, 9 December 2021 (UTC)