![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on April 6, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep, no consensus. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
This article, if kept, should certainly be updated. The entire lead section can be deleted, with any useful information moved to Lead paint and updated with health considerations and given a new intro to indicate the dates lead paint was common; this is an historical item. The rest is about various techniques and would serve as a good overview parent article. One puppy's opinion. I will do as much of the necessary work as possible, but am not interested in putting forth the effort until the Afd is completed. KillerChihuahua ?!? 11:16, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
I paint pictures. I don't do painterwork. The information here is more appropriate to a article on artists materials, media and methods which should be linked. It should also include information about acrylic paints, encaustics, tempera paint, watercolors, etc. (JK) 7/06
This is a 100 year old article on "painterwork", a vocation that hardly exists any more. House painters no longer deal so directly with constituent ingredients, artists do, but in a rather more precise manner.
So what's to do with this? As it stands, this article just doesn't fit. We would appear to have three options:
Your thoughts? Andy Dingley ( talk) 12:44, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
The present-day use of the word "Painterwork" seems to be confined to Scotland, as a variant of "Paintwork". I've added a hatnote to direct any enquirers to Paint. The historical information on particular types of paint and techniques would be best distributed among the relevant articles, with appropriate caveats : Noyster (talk), 12:24, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on April 6, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep, no consensus. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
This article, if kept, should certainly be updated. The entire lead section can be deleted, with any useful information moved to Lead paint and updated with health considerations and given a new intro to indicate the dates lead paint was common; this is an historical item. The rest is about various techniques and would serve as a good overview parent article. One puppy's opinion. I will do as much of the necessary work as possible, but am not interested in putting forth the effort until the Afd is completed. KillerChihuahua ?!? 11:16, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
I paint pictures. I don't do painterwork. The information here is more appropriate to a article on artists materials, media and methods which should be linked. It should also include information about acrylic paints, encaustics, tempera paint, watercolors, etc. (JK) 7/06
This is a 100 year old article on "painterwork", a vocation that hardly exists any more. House painters no longer deal so directly with constituent ingredients, artists do, but in a rather more precise manner.
So what's to do with this? As it stands, this article just doesn't fit. We would appear to have three options:
Your thoughts? Andy Dingley ( talk) 12:44, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
The present-day use of the word "Painterwork" seems to be confined to Scotland, as a variant of "Paintwork". I've added a hatnote to direct any enquirers to Paint. The historical information on particular types of paint and techniques would be best distributed among the relevant articles, with appropriate caveats : Noyster (talk), 12:24, 21 August 2016 (UTC)